January 2011

Editorial Board
Published in issue: January 2011
IFC

Table of Contents
Published in issue: January 2011
A3-A4

Editorial

Definitions and framework for knowledge translation to continue to evolve
• Peter Tugwell,
• J. Andre Knottnerus,
• Leanne Idzerda
Published in issue: January 2011
p1-2

Knowledge Translation Series - Guest Editor, Sharon Straus

A decade of knowledge translation research—what has changed?
• Beverley J. Shea
Published in issue: January 2011
p3-5

Knowledge translation is the use of knowledge in health care decision making
• Sharon E. Straus,
• Jacqueline M. Tetroe,
• Ian D. Graham
Published online: November 18, 2009
p6-10

The art and science of knowledge synthesis
• Andrea C. Tricco,
• Jennifer Tetzlaff,
• David Moher
Published online: March 02, 2010
p11-20
Successful high-quality knowledge translation research: three case studies
• Sumit R. Majumdar
Published online: November 05, 2009
p21-24
Moving knowledge to action through dissemination and exchange
• Michelle L. Gagnon
Published online: December 11, 2009
p25-31

Methodologies to evaluate the effectiveness of knowledge translation interventions: a primer for researchers and health care managers
• Onil K. Bhattacharyya,
• Elizabeth A. Estey,
• Merrick Zwarenstein
Published in issue: January 2011
p32-40

Commentaries

The analysis of case-control studies of the efficacy of screening for recurrence of cancer
• Noel S. Weiss
Published in issue: January 2011
p41-43
Case–control studies of cancer surveillance procedures
• Scott David Ramsey,
• Ruth Etzioni
Published in issue: January 2011
p44
Determining which fractures are osteoporotic: Empirical associations would provide better evidence than expert opinion
• Dawn C. Mackey
Published in issue: January 2011
p45

Original Articles

Which fractures are most attributable to osteoporosis?
• Amy H. Warriner,
• Nivedita M. Patkar,
• Jeffrey R. Curtis,
• ...
• Lisa Gary,
• Meredith Kilgore,
• Ken Saag
Published in issue: January 2011
p46-53

Five questions predicted long-term, severe, back-related functional limitations: evidence from three large prospective studies
• Clermont E. Dionne,
• Natalie Le Sage,
• Renée-Louise Franche,
• Michel Dorval,
• Claire Bombardier,
• Richard A. Deyo
Published online: May 10, 2010
p54-66

Subjective risk vs. objective risk can lead to different post-cesarean birth decisions based on multiattribute modeling
• Poonam S. Sharma,
• Karen B. Eden,
• Jeanne-Marie Guise,
• Holly B. Jimison,
• James G. Dolan
Published online: June 17, 2010
p67-78

A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed
• Michael Crowe,
• Lorraine Sheppard
Published online: June 21, 2010
p79-89
Are randomized trials conducted in China or India biased? A comparative empirical analysis
• Dalu Zhang,
• Nick Freemantle,
• K.K. Cheng
Published online: June 16, 2010
p90-95
Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed
• Jan Kottner,
• Laurent Audigé,
• Stig Brorson,
• ...
• Chris Roberts,
• Mohamed Shoukri,
• David L. Streiner
Published online: June 18, 2010
p96-106

Study design attributes influenced patients' willingness to participate in clinical research: a randomized vignette-based study
• Thomas Agoritsas,
• Marie Deom,
• Thomas V. Perneger
Published online: June 17, 2010
p107-115

Erratum

Erratum to: “Influence of trial registration on reporting quality of randomized trials: Study from highest ranked journals” [J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63(11):1216–22]
• L. Reveiz,
• M. Cortés-Jofré,
• C. Asenjo Lobos,
• ...
• I. Solà,
• E. Ospina
• Iberoamerican Cochrane Network
Published in issue: January 2011
p116