Current Issue Table of Contents: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Property	Value
Status
Version
Ad File
Disable Ads Flag
Environment
Moat Init
Moat Ready
Contextual Ready
Contextual URL
Contextual Initial Segments
Contextual Used Segments
AdUnit
SubAdUnit
Custom Targeting
Ad Events
Invalid Ad Sizes

Editorial Board

Published in issue: February 2023

IFC

Flexible approaches to clinical trials

Andrea C. Tricco,
David Tovey

Published in issue: February 2023

A1-A2

Commentary

A call for error management in academic clinical research

Stuart McLennan,
Matthias Briel

Published online: December 04, 2022

p208-211

Controversy and debate: challenges with the need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis paper 1: two challenges: absence of a clear cut, easily replicable test for the reference standard; unethical/infeasible inclusion of an invasive procedure in the reference standard

Martin H. Reed

Published online: December 08, 2022

p204-205

Challenges with need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis: paper 2: real-world case examples from GRADE for when a reference standard is not clearly defined/ easily replicable or when it is infeasible/ unethical to perform the reference standard

Reem A. Mustafa,
Holger Schünemann

Published online: November 28, 2022

p206-207

Challenges with need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis: paper 3: response to mustafa and schunemann

Martin H. Reed

Published online: November 28, 2022

p216-217

Challenges with need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis paper 4: response to reed

Reem A. Mustafa,
Holger J. Schünemann

Published online: December 19, 2022

p218

Minimal reporting improvement after peer review in reports of COVID-19 prediction models: systematic review

Mohammed T. Hudda,
Lucinda Archer,
Maarten van Smeden,
...
Richard D. Riley,
Ben Van Calster,
Laure Wynants

Published online: December 14, 2022

p75-84

Open Access

The Global Evidence Commission's report provided a wake-up call for the evidence community

Ruth Stewart,
Isabelle Boutron,
Elie A. Akl

Published online: October 09, 2022

p212-215

Improving grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation evidence tables part 4: a three-arm noninferiority randomized trial demonstrates improved understanding of content in summary of findings tables with a new format

Rebecca L. Morgan,
Juan José Yepes-Nuñez,
Joycelyne Ewusie,
...
Paul Shekelle,
Timothy J. Wilt,
Holger J. Schünemann

Published online: December 08, 2022

p125-135

Decision criteria for selecting essential medicines and their connection to guidelines: an interpretive descriptive qualitative interview study

Thomas Piggott,
Lorenzo Moja,
Elie A. Akl,
...
Benedikt Huttner,
Pablo Alonso-Coello,
Holger Schünemann

Published online: December 27, 2022

p146-155

The GIN-McMaster guideline tool extension for the integration of quality improvement and quality assurance in guidelines: a description of the methods for its development

Thomas Piggott,
Miranda W. Langendam,
Elena Parmelli,
...
Zuleika Saz-Parkinson,
Philip J. van der Wees,
Holger J. Schünemann

Published online: April 14, 2022

p197-203

Open Access

Review Articles

Systematic review identifies the design and methodological conduct of studies on machine learning-based prediction models

Constanza L. Andaur Navarro,
Johanna A.A. Damen,
Maarten van Smeden,
...
Richard D. Riley,
Karel G.M. Moons,
Lotty Hooft

Published online: November 24, 2022

p8-22

Open Access

Clinical trial data-sharing policies among journals, funding agencies, foundations, and other professional organizations: a scoping review

Austin L. Johnson,
J. Michael Anderson,
Max Bouvette,
...
Matthew J. Page,
Patti McCall Wright,
Matt Vassar

Published online: November 11, 2022

p42-55

A systematic scoping review of just-in-time, adaptive interventions finds limited automation and incomplete reporting

Theodora Oikonomidi,
Philippe Ravaud,
Jonathan LeBeau,
Viet-Thi Tran

Published online: December 12, 2022

p108-116

A scoping review finds that guides to authors of protocols for observational epidemiological studies varied highly in format and content

Daniel Malmsiø,
Anders Frost,
Asbjørn Hróbjartsson

Published online: December 19, 2022

p156-166

Open Access

Original Articles

Most systematic reviews that used the term “update” in title/abstract were not an updated version

Renata Runjic,
Antonia Jelicic Kadic,
Edita Runjic,
...
Tanja Rombey,
Dawid Pieper,
Livia Puljak

Published online: November 24, 2022

p1-7

Indicators of questionable research practices were identified in 163,129 randomized controlled trials

Johanna A. Damen,
Pauline Heus,
Herm J. Lamberink,
...
Willem M. Otte,
Christiaan H. Vinkers,
Lotty Hooft

Published online: December 01, 2022

p23-32

Open Access

Complete case logistic regression with a dichotomised continuous outcome led to biased estimates

Rosaleen Peggy Cornish,
Jonathan William Bartlett,
John Macleod,
Kate Tilling

Published online: December 01, 2022

p33-41

Open Access

Recalibration of prediction model was needed for monitoring health care quality in subgroups: a retrospective cohort study

Hideki Endo,
Shigehiko Uchino,
Satoru Hashimoto,
Nao Ichihara,
Hiroaki Miyata

Published online: December 09, 2022

p56-64

Imputing missing laboratory results may return erroneous values because they are not missing at random

Carl van Walraven,
Christopher McCudden,
Peter C. Austin

Published online: December 14, 2022

p65-74

Reporting quality was suboptimal in a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with adaptive designs

Sujata Purja,
Sunuk Park,
SuA Oh,
Minji Kim,
EunYoung Kim

Published online: December 16, 2022

p85-96

A multicenter prospective study validated a nomogram to predict individual risk of dependence in ambulation after rehabilitation

Bruno Bernardini,
Luigi Baratto,
Costanza Pizzi,
...
Dolores Catelan,
Maria Luisa Malosio,
Elisa Malagamba

Published online: November 17, 2022

p97-107

Open Access

Distributions of baseline categorical variables were different from the expected distributions in randomized trials with integrity concerns

Mark J. Bolland,
Greg D. Gamble,
Alison Avenell,
David J. Cooper,
Andrew Grey

Published online: December 27, 2022

p117-124

No short-term mortality from benzodiazepine use post-acute ischemic stroke after accounting for bias

Lidia M.V.R. Moura,
Zhiyu Yan,
Maria A. Donahue,
...
Sebastien Haneuse,
Deborah Blacker,
Sonia Hernandez-Diaz

Published online: December 22, 2022

p136-145

Reporting according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses for abstracts (PRISMA-A) depends on abstract length

Jasmin Helbach,
Falk Hoffmann,
Dawid Pieper,
Katharina Allers

Published online: December 27, 2022

p167-177

A rapid priority setting exercise combining existing, emergent evidence with stakeholder knowledge identified broad topic uncertainties

Nicole O'Connor,
Katie H. Thomson,
Sean Gill,
Sara Jackson,
Sheila A. Wallace,
Fiona Pearson

Published online: December 01, 2022

p178-187

Open Access

Considering multiple outcomes with different weights informed the hierarchy of interventions in network meta-analysis

Dimitris Mavridis,
Adriani Nikolakopoulou,
Irini Moustaki,
...
Raphaël Porcher,
Isabelle Boutron,
Philippe Ravaud

Published online: December 26, 2022

p188-196

“Meta-epidemiological study” is a study in which the unit of analysis is a study, not a patient; response to Puljak et al.

Yuki Kataoka,

Masahiro Banno,

Yasushi Tsujimoto,

Toshi A. Furukawa

Published online: December 08, 2022

p219-220

Challenges with defining a meta-epidemiological study as “study in which the unit of analysis is a study, not a patient”: author’s reply

Livia Puljak

Published online: December 08, 2022

p220-221

February 2023

Editorial Board

Table of Contents

Editors' Choice

Flexible approaches to clinical trials

Commentary

A call for error management in academic clinical research

Controversy and Debate: Challenges with Need to Improve the Reference Standard in Diagnosis

Controversy and debate: challenges with the need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis paper 1: two challenges: absence of a clear cut, easily replicable test for the reference standard; unethical/infeasible inclusion of an invasive procedure in the reference standard

Challenges with need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis: paper 2: real-world case examples from GRADE for when a reference standard is not clearly defined/ easily replicable or when it is infeasible/ unethical to perform the reference standard

Challenges with need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis: paper 3: response to mustafa and schunemann

Challenges with need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis paper 4: response to reed

Covid-19 Series

Minimal reporting improvement after peer review in reports of COVID-19 prediction models: systematic review

The Global Evidence Commission's report provided a wake-up call for the evidence community

Other GRADE Papers

Improving grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation evidence tables part 4: a three-arm noninferiority randomized trial demonstrates improved understanding of content in summary of findings tables with a new format

Decision criteria for selecting essential medicines and their connection to guidelines: an interpretive descriptive qualitative interview study

The GIN-McMaster guideline tool extension for the integration of quality improvement and quality assurance in guidelines: a description of the methods for its development

Review Articles

Systematic review identifies the design and methodological conduct of studies on machine learning-based prediction models

Clinical trial data-sharing policies among journals, funding agencies, foundations, and other professional organizations: a scoping review

A systematic scoping review of just-in-time, adaptive interventions finds limited automation and incomplete reporting

A scoping review finds that guides to authors of protocols for observational epidemiological studies varied highly in format and content

Original Articles

Most systematic reviews that used the term “update” in title/abstract were not an updated version

Indicators of questionable research practices were identified in 163,129 randomized controlled trials

Complete case logistic regression with a dichotomised continuous outcome led to biased estimates

Recalibration of prediction model was needed for monitoring health care quality in subgroups: a retrospective cohort study

Imputing missing laboratory results may return erroneous values because they are not missing at random

Reporting quality was suboptimal in a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with adaptive designs

A multicenter prospective study validated a nomogram to predict individual risk of dependence in ambulation after rehabilitation

Distributions of baseline categorical variables were different from the expected distributions in randomized trials with integrity concerns

No short-term mortality from benzodiazepine use post-acute ischemic stroke after accounting for bias

Reporting according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses for abstracts (PRISMA-A) depends on abstract length

A rapid priority setting exercise combining existing, emergent evidence with stakeholder knowledge identified broad topic uncertainties

Considering multiple outcomes with different weights informed the hierarchy of interventions in network meta-analysis

Letters to the Editor

“Meta-epidemiological study” is a study in which the unit of analysis is a study, not a patient; response to Puljak et al.

Challenges with defining a meta-epidemiological study as “study in which the unit of analysis is a study, not a patient”: author’s reply