Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Property	Value
Status
Version
Ad File
Disable Ads Flag
Environment
Moat Init
Moat Ready
Contextual Ready
Contextual URL
Contextual Initial Segments
Contextual Used Segments
AdUnit
SubAdUnit
Custom Targeting
Ad Events
Invalid Ad Sizes

Is complexity just too complex?

Geoff Wong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.019

Vol. 66, Issue 11, p1199–1201

Full-Text HTML PDF

Introducing conceptual and analytical clarity on dimensions of complexity in systematic reviews of complex interventions

Prathap Tharyan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.004

Vol. 66, Issue 11, p1202–1204

Full-Text HTML PDF

Introducing a series of methodological articles on considering complexity in systematic reviews of interventions

Laurie M. Anderson, Mark Petticrew, Jackie Chandler, Jeremy Grimshaw, Peter Tugwell, Jennifer O’Neill, Vivian Welch, Janet Squires, Rachel Churchill, Ian Shemilt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.005

Vol. 66, Issue 11, p1205–1208

Full-Text HTML PDF

Complex interventions and their implications for systematic reviews: a pragmatic approach

Mark Petticrew, Laurie Anderson, Randy Elder, Jeremy Grimshaw, David Hopkins, Robert Hahn, Lauren Krause, Elizabeth Kristjansson, Shawna Mercer, Teresa Sipe, Peter Tugwell, Erin Ueffing, Elizabeth Waters, Vivian Welch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.004

Vol. 66, Issue 11, p1209–1214

Full-Text HTML PDF

Systematic reviews of complex interventions: framing the review question

Janet E. Squires, Jeffrey C. Valentine, Jeremy M. Grimshaw

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.05.013

Vol. 66, Issue 11, p1215–1222

Full-Text HTML PDF

Investigating complexity in systematic reviews of interventions by using a spectrum of methods

Laurie M. Anderson, Sandy R. Oliver, Susan Michie, Eva Rehfuess, Jane Noyes, Ian Shemilt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.014

Vol. 66, Issue 11, p1223–1229

Full-Text HTML PDF

Synthesizing evidence on complex interventions: how meta-analytical, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches can contribute

Mark Petticrew, Eva Rehfuess, Jane Noyes, Julian P.T. Higgins, Alain Mayhew, Tomas Pantoja, Ian Shemilt, Amanda Sowden

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.005

Vol. 66, Issue 11, p1230–1243

Full-Text HTML PDF

Identifying, documenting, and examining heterogeneity in systematic reviews of complex interventions

Terri Pigott, Sasha Shepperd

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.013

Vol. 66, Issue 11, p1244–1250

Full-Text HTML PDF

Assessing the applicability of findings in systematic reviews of complex interventions can enhance the utility of reviews for decision making

Belinda Burford, Simon Lewin, Vivian Welch, Eva Rehfuess, Elizabeth Waters

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.017

Vol. 66, Issue 11, p1251–1261

Full-Text HTML PDF

A research and development agenda for systematic reviews that ask complex questions about complex interventions

Jane Noyes, David Gough, Simon Lewin, Alain Mayhew, Susan Michie, Tomas Pantoja, Mark Petticrew, Kevin Pottie, Eva Rehfuess, Ian Shemilt, Sasha Shepperd, Amanda Sowden, Peter Tugwell, Vivian Welch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.003

Vol. 66, Issue 11, p1262–1270

Full-Text HTML PDF

Considering Complexity in Systematic Reviews of Intervention

Is complexity just too complex?

Introducing conceptual and analytical clarity on dimensions of complexity in systematic reviews of complex interventions

Introducing a series of methodological articles on considering complexity in systematic reviews of interventions

Complex interventions and their implications for systematic reviews: a pragmatic approach

Systematic reviews of complex interventions: framing the review question

Investigating complexity in systematic reviews of interventions by using a spectrum of methods

Synthesizing evidence on complex interventions: how meta-analytical, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches can contribute

Identifying, documenting, and examining heterogeneity in systematic reviews of complex interventions

Assessing the applicability of findings in systematic reviews of complex interventions can enhance the utility of reviews for decision making

A research and development agenda for systematic reviews that ask complex questions about complex interventions