x
Filter:
Filters applied
- AHRQ Series
- Research ArticleRemove Research Article filter
- Atkins, DavidRemove Atkins, David filter
Author
- Bass, Eric B1
- Bruening, Wendy1
- Chang, Stephanie1
- Fox, Steven1
- Helfand, Mark1
- Johnson, Eric1
- Kane, Robert1
- Lohr, Kathleen N1
- Morton, Sally C1
- Norris, Susan L1
- Oremus, Mark1
- Ospina, Maria1
- Owens, Douglas K1
- Randhawa, Gurvaneet1
- Reston, James T1
- Schoelles, Karen1
- Shekelle, Paul1
- Treadwell, Jonathan R1
- Viswanathan, Meera1
AHRQ Series
2 Results
- AHRQ Series Part II: Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness - Guest Editor, Mark Helfand
Observational studies in systemic reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyVol. 64Issue 11p1178–1186Published online: June 2, 2011- Susan L. Norris
- David Atkins
- Wendy Bruening
- Steven Fox
- Eric Johnson
- Robert Kane
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 43Systematic reviewers disagree about the ability of observational studies to answer questions about the benefits or intended effects of pharmacotherapeutic, device, or procedural interventions. This study provides a framework for decision making on the inclusion of observational studies to assess benefits and intended effects in comparative effectiveness reviews (CERs). - Original Article
AHRQ Series Paper 5: Grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions—Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Effective Health-Care Program
Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyVol. 63Issue 5p513–523Published online: July 13, 2009- Douglas K. Owens
- Kathleen N. Lohr
- David Atkins
- Jonathan R. Treadwell
- James T. Reston
- Eric B. Bass
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 353To establish guidance on grading strength of evidence for the Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) program of the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.