x
Filter:
Filters applied
- AHRQ Series
- Review ArticleRemove Review Article filter
- Atkins, DavidRemove Atkins, David filter
- Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyRemove Journal of Clinical Epidemiology filter
AHRQ Series
2 Results
- AHRQ Series Part II: Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness - Guest Editor, Mark Helfand
Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyVol. 64Issue 11p1198–1207Published online: April 4, 2011- David Atkins
- Stephanie M. Chang
- Gerald Gartlehner
- David I. Buckley
- Evelyn P. Whitlock
- Elise Berliner
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 46To describe a systematic approach for identifying, reporting, and synthesizing information to allow consistent and transparent consideration of the applicability of the evidence in a systematic review according to the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Setting domains. - Review Article
AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program
Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyVol. 63Issue 5p502–512Published online: September 29, 2008- Roger Chou
- Naomi Aronson
- David Atkins
- Afisi S. Ismaila
- Pasqualina Santaguida
- David H. Smith
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 130Comparative effectiveness reviews (CERs) are systematic reviews that evaluate evidence on alternative interventions to help clinicians, policy makers, and patients make informed treatment choices. Reviews should assess harms and benefits to provide balanced assessments of alternative interventions. Identifying important harms of treatment and quantifying the magnitude of any risks require CER authors to consider a broad range of data sources, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies.
