This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
Abstract
Background
In biomedical research, spin is the overinterpretation of findings, and it is a growing concern. To date, the presence of spin has not been evaluated in prognostic model research in oncology, including studies developing and validating models for individualised risk prediction.
Study design and setting
We conducted a systematic review, searching MEDLINE and EMBASE for oncology-related studies that developed and validated a prognostic model using machine learning published between 01/01/2019 and 05/09/2019. We used existing spin frameworks and described areas of highly suggestive spin practices.
Results
We included 62 publications (including 152 developed models; 37 validated models). Reporting was inconsistent between methods and the results in 27% of studies due to additional analysis and selective reporting. Thirty-two studies (out of 36 applicable studies) reported comparisons between developed models in their discussion and predominantly used discrimination measures to support their claims (78%). Thirty-five studies (56%) used an overly strong or leading word in their title, abstract, results, discussion or conclusion.
Conclusion
The potential for spin needs to be considered when reading, interpreting, and using studies that developed and validated prognostic models in oncology. Researchers should carefully report their prognostic model research using words that reflect their actual results and strength of evidence.
Keywords
List of abbreviations:
TRIPOD (Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis), PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), STROBE (STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology), SGB (Stochastic Gradient Boosting), ANN (Artificial Neural Network), AUC (Area Under the Curve)Article info
Publication history
Accepted:
March 14,
2023
Received in revised form:
March 3,
2023
Received:
September 22,
2022
Publication stage
In Press Journal Pre-ProofFootnotes
Registration: CRD42019140361
Identification
Copyright
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
User license
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) | How you can reuse
Elsevier's open access license policy

Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0)
Permitted
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
Elsevier's open access license policy