There are many challenges (eg, overlapping observations) that are more common–although
not unique–in a systematic review (SR) that includes studies, which are based on routinely
collected data (e.g., registries) compared to a SR, which only includes randomized
trials or studies that are based on data specifically collected for these studies.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Patient registries: utility, validity and inference.Rare Diseases Epidemiology, Dordrecht2010: 87-104
- Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide.2014 (Available at)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK208616/Date accessed: July 6, 2022
- Study design classification of registry-based studies in systematic reviews.J Clin Epidemiol. 2018; 93: 84-87
- Relationship between volume and outcome for gastroschisis: a systematic review.J Pediatr Surg. 2022; 57: 763-785
- Hospital volume-outcome relationship in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 30: 2862-2877
- A systematic review and time-response meta-analysis of the optimal timing of elective caesarean sections for best maternal and neonatal health outcomes.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20: 395
- Pay for performance for hospitals.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 7: Cd011156
- A systematic review of the impact of center volume in dialysis.BMC Res Notes. 2015; 8: 812
- Study design search filters.(Available at)https://bestpractice.bmj.com/info/toolkit/learn-ebm/study-design-search-filters/Date accessed: July 7, 2022
- Development and validation of study filters for identifying controlled non-randomized studies in PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE.Res Synth Methods. 2020; 11: 617-626
- Proximal humeral fractures in Sweden—a registry-based study.Osteoporos Int. 2017; 28: 901-907
- The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses Oxford.2000 (Available at)
- Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors.Ann Intern Med. 2013; 158: 280-286
- ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.BMJ. 2016; 355: i4919
- A generalized-weights solution to sample overlap in meta-analysis.Res Synth Methods. 2020; 11: 812-832
- Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies with overlapping subjects.Am J Hum Genet. 2009; 85: 862-872
- Global association of COVID-19 pandemic measures with cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JAMA Oncol. 2022; 8: 1287-1293
Article info
Publication history
Published online: February 16, 2023
Accepted:
February 13,
2023
Publication stage
In Press Journal Pre-ProofFootnotes
Conflicts of interest: Nothing to declare.
Author statement: Tim Mathes: Writing - Original Draft, Writing- Reviewing and Editing. Zhentian Zhang: Writing - Original Draft, Writing- Reviewing and Editing. Alexander Pachanov: Writing - Original Draft, Writing- Reviewing and Editing. Dawid Pieper: Writing - Original Draft, Writing- Reviewing and Editing.
Identification
Copyright
© 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
