Advertisement
Original Article|Articles in Press

A cross-sectional analysis identified co-authorship networks and scientific collaboration on reporting guidelines for health research

  • Author Footnotes
    ± Contributed equally to this work
    Ferrán Catalá-López
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author(s): Department of Health Planning and Economics, National School of Public Health, Institute of Health Carlos III, Avda. Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain. Tel: +34-9182-22239. F. Catalá-LópezA. Alonso-Arroyo
    Footnotes
    ± Contributed equally to this work
    Affiliations
    Department of Health Planning and Economics, National School of Public Health, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

    Department of Medicine, University of Valencia/INCLIVA Health Research Institute and CIBERSAM, Valencia, Spain

    Knowledge Synthesis Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI), Ottawa, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    ± Contributed equally to this work
    Adolfo Alonso-Arroyo
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author(s): Department of Health Planning and Economics, National School of Public Health, Institute of Health Carlos III, Avda. Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain. Tel: +34-9182-22239. F. Catalá-LópezA. Alonso-Arroyo
    Footnotes
    ± Contributed equally to this work
    Affiliations
    Department of History of Science and Documentation, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

    Unidad de Información e Investigación Social y Sanitaria-UISYS, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
    Search for articles by this author
  • Matthew J Page
    Affiliations
    School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Lourdes Castelló-Cogollos
    Affiliations
    Unidad de Información e Investigación Social y Sanitaria-UISYS, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

    Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
    Search for articles by this author
  • Brian Hutton
    Affiliations
    Knowledge Synthesis Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI), Ottawa, Canada

    School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Manuel Ridao
    Affiliations
    Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud (IACS), Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Zaragoza, Spain
    Search for articles by this author
  • Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos
    Affiliations
    Department of Medicine, University of Valencia/INCLIVA Health Research Institute and CIBERSAM, Valencia, Spain
    Search for articles by this author
  • Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent
    Affiliations
    Unidad de Información e Investigación Social y Sanitaria-UISYS, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

    Ingenio-Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) and Universitat Politècnica de Valencia (UPV), Valencia, Spain
    Search for articles by this author
  • David Moher
    Affiliations
    School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

    Centre for Journalology and Canadian EQUATOR Centre, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    ± Contributed equally to this work
Published:February 21, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.02.001
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Highlights

      • In this study, we investigated the characteristics of scientific collaboration and the citation metrics of reporting guidelines for health research.
      • Numerous reporting guidelines for health research exist, relating to broad research types, and very specific methodological or health contexts.

      Abstract

      Objective

      To investigate scientific collaboration and citation metrics of reporting guidelines for health research.

      Study design and setting

      Cross-sectional analysis of published articles for reporting guidelines for health research. A search of the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network Library (from inception to January 21, 2021) was supplemented by searching websites of guideline developers. For each article, metadata (e.g., authors, institutions, countries, citations) were extracted from the Web of Science and Scopus (up to October 25, 2021). Descriptive analyses were conducted. Network analyses of collaborations were presented.

      Results

      We included 662 articles published in 332 journals. The BMJ (n=50 articles; 8%), Annals of Internal Medicine (n=29; 4%), and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (n=24; 4%) published the largest number of articles. 4722 authors, 1647 institutions, and 83 countries were involved. The global productivity was led by the United States (n=456 articles), the United Kingdom (n=414), and Canada (n=306). We found 8 clusters of authors (e.g., one major group with 337 members) and 3 clusters of institutions (e.g., one major group with 256 members). The most prolific authors were affiliated with the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Canada), the University of Ottawa (Canada), the University of Oxford (United Kingdom), and Stanford University (United States).

      Conclusion

      Our analysis identified key actors producing reporting guidelines, most intense collaborations, and ‘citation classics’ in the field. These results could potentially be used to strengthen collaborations for developing and disseminating reporting guidelines for health research.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect