Abstract
Objectives
As part of an effort to develop an extension of the Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement for living systematic
reviews (LSRs), we discuss conceptual issues relevant to the reporting of LSRs and
highlight a few challenges.
Methods
Discussion of conceptual issues based on a scoping review of the literature and discussions
among authors.
Results
We first briefly describe aspects of the LSR production process relevant to reporting.
The production cycles differ by whether the literature surveillance identifies new
evidence and whether newly identified evidence is judged to be consequential. This
impacts the timing, content, and format of LSR versions. Second, we discuss four types
of information that are specific to the reporting of LSRs: justification for adopting
the living mode, LSR specific methods, changes between LSR versions, and LSR updating
status. We also discuss the challenge of conveying changes between versions to the
reader. Third, we describe two commonly used reporting formats of LSRs: full and partial
reports. Although partial reports are easier to produce and publish, they lead to
the scattering of information across different versions. Full reports ensure the completeness
of reporting. We discuss the implications for the extension of the PRISMA 2020 statement
for LSRs.
Conclusion
We argue that a dynamic publication platform would facilitate complete and timely
reporting of LSRs.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how.J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 91: 23-30
- Living systematic reviews: 4. Living guideline recommendations.J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 91: 47-53
- Interventions for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19: a living mapping of research and living network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 11: CD013769
- The COVID-NMA project: building an evidence ecosystem for the COVID-19 pandemic.Ann Intern Med. 2020; 173: 1015-1017
- A living WHO guideline on drugs for covid-19.BMJ. 2020; 370: m3379
- Drug treatments for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ. 2020; 370: m2980
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.BMJ. 2021; 372: n71
- Extension of the PRISMA 2020 statement for living systematic reviews (LSRs): protocol.F1000Res. 2022; 11: 109
- Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol.F1000Res. 2021; 10: 802
- When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist.BMJ. 2016; 354: i3507
- Reporting the findings of updated systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Rockville (MD)2013
- Cochrane Library. About Cochrane Reviews.(Available at)
- A framework for the development of living practice guidelines in health care.Ann Intern Med. 2022; 175: 1154-1160
- Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort.J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 91: 31-37
- Feasibility and acceptability of living systematic reviews: results from a mixed-methods evaluation.Syst Rev. 2019; 8: 1-14
- Methodological challenges for living systematic reviews conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic: a concept paper.J Clin Epidemiol. 2022; 141: 82-89
- Tailored PRISMA 2020 flow diagrams for living systematic reviews: a methodological survey and a proposal.F1000Res. 2021; 10: 192
- F1000Research. Article guidelines.(Available at)https://f1000research.com/for-authors/article-guidelines-new-versionsDate accessed: February 8, 2023
- Assigning what’s new events to Cochrane reviews skip to end of metadata.(Available at)https://documentation.cochrane.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=117380266#:∼:text=What's%20New%20events%20are%20used,have%20been%20changed%20or%20notDate: 2020Date accessed: December 3, 2020
Article info
Publication history
Published online: February 01, 2023
Accepted:
January 26,
2023
Publication stage
In Press Journal Pre-ProofFootnotes
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article.
Data statement: Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author Contributions: EAA conceptualized the paper, EAA and JK designed the paper. All authors contributed to the content and structure of the paper. JK and EAA wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved the final version.
Identification
Copyright
© 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
