Advertisement
Letter to the Editor|Articles in Press

Download started.

Ok

Is it time for a common peer review format for biomedical journals?

Published:January 11, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.01.001
Is it time for a common peer review format for biomedical journals?
Previous ArticleMethods for Living Guidelines: Early Guidance Based on Practical Experience. Paper 4: Search methods and approaches for living guidelines
Next ArticleMethods for Living Guidelines: Early Guidance based on practical experience. Paper 1: Introduction
      Peer review reports are highly heterogeneous. In this letter to the Editor, we propose to develop a standard peer review format for biomedical journals.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Register: Create an account
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Von Elm E.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Egger M.
        • Pocock S.J.
        • Gøtzsche P.C.
        • Vandenbroucke J.P.
        The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
        Lancet. 2007; 370: 1453-1457
        View in Article
        • Schulz K.F.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Moher D.
        CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.
        BMJ. 2010; 340: c332
        View in Article
        • Page M.J.
        • McKenzie J.E.
        • Bossuyt P.M.
        • Boutron I.
        • Hoffmann T.C.
        • Mulrow C.D.
        • et al.
        The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
        BMJ. 2021; 372: n71
        View in Article
        • Fraser S.
        Opportunities to enhance peer review.
        Can Fam Physician. 2022; 68: 632
        View in Article
        • Superchi C.
        • Hren D.
        • Blanco D.
        • Rius R.
        • Recchioni A.
        • Boutron I.
        • et al.
        Development of ARCADIA: a tool for assessing the quality of peer-review reports in biomedical research.
        BMJ Open. 2020; 10: e035604
        View in Article
        • Van Rooyen S.
        • Black N.
        • Godlee F.
        Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1999; 52: 625-629
        View in Article

      Article info

      Publication history

      Published online: January 11, 2023

      Publication stage

      In Press Journal Pre-Proof

      Footnotes

      Funding: This work is part of the research conducting to the PhD degree of Cristina Candal-Pedreira, who has received a PFIS fellowship (reference number FI21/00149) from the Health Institute Carlos III (ISCIII). The funders had no role in the preparation of the manuscript.

      Conflict of interest: The authors declare they don't have any conflicts of interest regarding this manuscript.

      Declaration of interests: Cristina Candal-Pedreira reports financial support was provided by the Health Institute Carlos III.

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.01.001

      Copyright

      © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect
      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the for this site.
      Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties. The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      RELX