Advertisement

Challenges with need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis: paper 3. Response to Mustafa and Schunemann

  • Martin H. Reed
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Department of Radiology, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, 197 Harvard Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3M 0J9. Tel.: +1 204 782 9764; fax: +1 204 782 1402.
    Affiliations
    Department of Radiology, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
Published:November 28, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.11.017
      A recognition of two problems with defining reference standards for diagnostic tests.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Mustafa R.A.
        • Schunemann H.
        Assessing the certainty of evidence of test accuracy studies when there are challenges with establishing a reference standard.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2022;
      1. Reed M. H. Challenges with the Need to Improve the Reference Standard in Diagnostic Imaging: Paper 1: Two challenges: Absence of a clear cut, easily replicable test for the Reference Standard; Unethical/infeasible inclusion of an invasive procedure as the Reference Standard. n.d.

        • Patel P.
        • Patel P.
        • Bhatt M.
        • Braun C.
        • Begum H.
        • Wiercioch W.
        • et al.
        Systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism.
        Blood Adv. 2020; 4: 4296-4311
        • Filograna L.
        • Pugliese L.
        • Muto M.
        • Tatulli D.
        • Guglielmi G.
        • Thali M.J.
        • et al.
        A practical guide to virtual autopsy: why, when and how.
        Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2019; 40: 56-66
        • Palm V.
        • Rengier F.
        • Rajiah P.
        • Heussel C.P.
        • Partovi S.
        Acute pulmonary embolism: imaging techniques, findings, endovascular treatment and differential diagnoses.
        Rofo. 2020; 192: 38-49
        • Tan S.
        • Haramati L.
        Overdiagnosis versus mis diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2016; 206: W59
        • Reed M.H.
        Evidence in diagnostic imaging: going beyond accuracy.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2012; 9: 90-92
        • Gartlehner G.
        • Wagner G.
        • Affengruber L.
        • Chapman A.
        • Dobrescu A.
        • Klerings I.
        • et al.
        Point-of-care ultrasonography in patients with acute dyspnea: an evidence report for a clinical practice guideline by the American college of physicians.
        Ann Intern Med. 2021; 174: 967-976
        • Laursen C.B.
        • Sloth E.
        • Lassen A.T.
        • Christensen R.D.P.
        • Lambrechtsen J.
        • Madsen P.H.
        • et al.
        Point-of-care ultrasonography in patients admitted with respiratory symptoms: a single-blind, randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet Respir Med. 2014; 2: 638-646