Abstract
Objectives
Study Design and Setting
Results
Conclusion
Keywords
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyReferences
- A descriptive analysis of overviews of reviews published between 2000 and 2011.PLoS One. 2012; 7: e49667
- Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000-2019.J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 138: 1-11
- Systematic reviews, overviews of reviews and comparative effectiveness reviews: a discussion of approaches to knowledge synthesis.Evid Based Child Health. 2014; 9: 486-494
- Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: the preferred reporting items for overviews of reviews (PRIOR) statement.BMJ. 2022; 378: e070849
- Global mapping of overviews of systematic reviews in healthcare published between 2000 and 2020: a bibliometric analysis.J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 137: 58-72
- Umbrella reviews: what they are and why we need them.Eur J Epidemiol. 2019; 34: 543-546
- Bibliometric study of ‘overviews of systematic reviews’ of health interventions: evaluation of prevalence, citation and journal impact factor.Res Synth Methods. 2022; 13: 109-120
- A new taxonomy was developed for overlap across “overviews of systematic reviews”: a meta-research study of research waste.Res Synth Methods. 2022; 13: 315-329
- An introduction to overviews of reviews: planning a relevant research question and objective for an overview.Syst Rev. 2018; 7: 39
- Cost-effectiveness of treatments for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and associated metastases: an overview of systematic reviews.Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021; 21: 353-364
- Identifying alternative models of healthcare service delivery to inform health system improvement: scoping review of systematic reviews.BMJ Open. 2020; 10: e036112
- Tackling physical inactivity in Scandinavia: a narrative review of reviews supplemented by expert interviews.Scand J Public Health. 2021; (14034948211042956)
- Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 1-purpose, eligibility, search and data extraction.Syst Rev. 2017; 6: 231
- Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2 - risk of bias assessment; Synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence.Syst Rev. 2018; 7: 159
- Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews.Syst Rev. 2017; 6: 145
- Overviews of systematic reviews: great promise, greater challenge.Syst Rev. 2017; 6: 185
- Evaluation of effectiveness and harms reporting in overviews of systematic reviews of interventions by developing new assessment tools [Doctoral dissertation].Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. 2021;
- Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements.Health Info Libr J. 2019; 36: 202-222
- What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018; 18: 5
- The Web-based “Right Review” tool asks reviewers simple questions to suggest methods from 41 Knowledge Synthesis methods.J Clin Epidemiol. 2022; 147: 42-51
- A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.Health Info Libr J. 2009; 26: 91-108
- The art and science of knowledge synthesis.J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 11-20
- Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis.J Clin Epidemiol. 2018; 96: 133-142
- Synthesizing information systems knowledge: a typology of literature reviews.Inf Manag. 2015; 52: 183-199
- A typology of systematic reviews for synthesising evidence on health care.Gerodontology. 2019; 36: 303-312
- Systematic reviews: a glossary for public health.Scand J Public Health. 2022; (14034948221074998)
- Clarifying differences between review designs and methods.Syst Rev. 2012; 1: 28
- Chapter V: overviews of reviews.in: Higgins J.P.T. Thomas J. Chandler J. Cumpston M. Li T. Page M.J.W.V. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3. Cochrane, 2021 (Available at)www.training.cochrane.org/handbookDate accessed: November 28, 2022
- Chapter 10: umbrella reviews.in: Aromataris E. Munn Z. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020 (Available at)https://synthesismanual.jbi.globalDate accessed: November 28, 2022
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.PLoS Med. 2009; 6: e1000097
- Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist: a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms.J Clin Epidemiol. 2018; 93: 9-24
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.BMJ. 2017; 358: j4008
- An algorithm was developed to assign GRADE levels of evidence to comparisons within systematic reviews.J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 70: 106-110
- Antenatal interventions for preventing stillbirth, fetal loss and perinatal death: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 12: CD009599
- Risk and protective factors for anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorders: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Psychol Med. 2020; 50: 1300-1315
- Predictors of functional outcome in musculoskeletal healthcare: an umbrella review.Eur J Pain. 2020; 24: 51-70
- Risk prediction models for acute kidney injury in adults: an overview of systematic reviews.PLoS One. 2021; 16: e0248899
- Accuracy of optical coherence tomography for diagnosing glaucoma: an overview of systematic reviews.Br J Ophthalmol. 2020; 105: 490-495
- The frequency of maternal morbidity: a systematic review of systematic reviews.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018; 141 Suppl: 20-38
- Stroke patients’ and informal carers’ experiences with life after stroke: an overview of qualitative systematic reviews.Disabil Rehabil. 2017; 39: 301-313
- Cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening and treatment methods: a systematic review of systematic reviews.BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; 17: 413
- Patient-reported outcome measures used for neck disorders: an overview of systematic reviews.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018; 48: 775-788
- Reporting guidelines on how to write a complete and transparent abstract for overviews of systematic reviews of health care interventions.J Clin Epidemiol. 2019; 106: 70-79
- Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.Syst Rev. 2019; 8: 335
- Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines.PLoS Med. 2010; 7: e1000217
- Effects of glutamine supplementation on critically ill patients: focus on efficacy and safety: an overview of systematic reviews.Nutrition. 2020; 78: 110960
- Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for major depressive disorder: review of systematic reviews.BMJ Open. 2017; 7: e014912
- Overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on systemic adverse events associated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor medication use.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018; 136: 557-566
- Association of hormonal contraceptive use with adverse health outcomes: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials and cohort studies.JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5: e2143730
- Cardiovascular toxicity of targeted therapies for cancer: an overview of systematic reviews.JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2020; 4: pkaa076
- Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews.Evid Based Ment Health. 2018; 21: 95-100
- Environmental risk factors, protective factors, and peripheral biomarkers for ADHD: an umbrella review.Lancet Psychiatry. 2020; 7: 955-970
- Pragmatic methods for reviewing exceptionally large bodies of evidence: systematic mapping review and overview of systematic reviews using lung cancer survival as an exemplar.Syst Rev. 2019; 8: 171
- Diagnostic and prognostic prediction models.J Thromb Haemost. 2013; 11: 129-141
- Chapter 12: drawing conclusions. Draft version (4 October 2022) for inclusion.in: Deeks J.J. Bossuyt P.M. Leeflang M.M. Takwoingi Y. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy version 2. Cochrane, London2013
- Simple statistical measures for diagnostic accuracy assessment.J Thorac Oncol. 2010; 5: 763-764
- Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models.Circulation. 2007; 115: 654-657
- Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009; 9: 59
- Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations.Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015; 13: 170-178
- Nutrition-specific interventions for preventing and controlling anaemia throughout the life cycle: an overview of systematic reviews.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 9: CD013092
- Therapeutic interventions for COVID-19: a living overview of reviews.Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2020; 14 (1753466620976021)
- Interventions for the prevention and management of occupational stress injury in first responders: a rapid overview of reviews.Syst Rev. 2020; 9: 121
- Evidence mapping based on systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions for soft tissue sarcomas.Clin Transl Oncol. 2019; 21: 1398-1412
- Developing a new clinical governance framework for chronic diseases in primary care: an umbrella review.BMJ Open. 2018; 8: e020626
- Meta-review of implementation determinants for policies promoting healthy diet and physically active lifestyle: application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.Implement Sci. 2022; 17: 2
- An umbrella review of effect size, bias, and power across meta-analyses in emergency medicine.Acad Emerg Med. 2021; 28: 1379-1388
- Systematic reviews of systematic quantitative, qualitative, and mixed studies reviews in healthcare research: how to assess the methodological quality of included reviews?.J Mix Methods Res. 2021; (15586898211054244)
- Best practice guidelines and essential methodological steps to conduct rigorous and systematic meta-reviews.Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2019; 11: 353-381
- Inhaled short-acting bronchodilators for managing emergency childhood asthma: an overview of reviews.Allergy. 2017; 72: 183-200
- Experiences of self-management support following a stroke: a meta-review of qualitative systematic reviews.PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0141803
- From systematic reviews to clinical recommendations for evidence-based health care: validation of revised assessment of multiple systematic reviews (R-AMSTAR) for grading of clinical relevance.Open Dent J. 2010; 4: 84-91
- A mega-ethnography of eleven qualitative evidence syntheses exploring the experience of living with chronic non-malignant pain.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017; 17: 116
- A mega-aggregation framework synthesis of the barriers and facilitators to linkage, adherence to ART and retention in care among people living with HIV.Syst Rev. 2021; 10: 54
- Indicators of home-based hospitalization model and strategies for its implementation: a systematic review of reviews.Syst Rev. 2020; 9: 172
- Effective rehabilitation interventions and participation among people with multiple sclerosis: an overview of reviews.Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2022; 65: 101529
- Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap.PLoS Med. 2014; 11: e1001603
- How to keep up to date with medical information using web-based resources: a systematised review and narrative synthesis.Health Info Libr J. 2020; 37: 254-292
- Living systematic reviews: 4. Living guideline recommendations.J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 91: 47-53
- Weekly updates of national living evidence-based guidelines: methods for the Australian living guidelines for care of people with COVID-19.J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 131: 11-21
- Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach.Syst Rev. 2012; 1: 10
- Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews.J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 130: 13-22
- A scoping review of rapid review methods.BMC Med. 2015; 13: 224
- Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.Implement Sci. 2010; 5: 69
- What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis.JBI Evid Synth. 2022; 20: 950-952
- Moving from consultation to co-creation with knowledge users in scoping reviews: guidance from the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group.JBI Evid Synth. 2022; 20: 969-979
- Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018; 18: 143
- A scoping approach to systematically review published reviews: adaptations and recommendations.Res Synth Methods. 2018; 9: 116-123
- What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products.Syst Rev. 2016; 5: 28
- Evidence maps and evidence gaps: evidence review mapping as a method for collating and appraising evidence reviews to inform research and policy.Environ Evid. 2017; 6: 19
- Interventions for reducing violence against children in low- and middle-income countries: an evidence and gap map.Campbell Syst Rev. 2020; 16: e1120
- Mega-map of systematic reviews and evidence and gap maps on the interventions to improve child well-being in low- and middle-income countries.Campbell Syst Rev. 2020; 16: e1116
- Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks.Implement Sci. 2015; 10: 53
- Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC).BMJ Open. 2020; 10: e040478
- A tutorial on methodological studies: the what, when, how and why.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020; 20: 226
- Research-on-research studies or methodological studies are primary research.J Clin Epidemiol. 2019; 112: 95
- Methodological studies evaluating evidence are not systematic reviews.J Clin Epidemiol. 2019; 110: 98-99
- Erectile dysfunction: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of risk-factors, treatment, and prevalence outcomes.J Sex Med. 2019; 16: 531-541
- Risk factors and therapies in vascular diseases: an umbrella review of updated systematic reviews and meta-analyses.J Cell Physiol. 2019; 234: 8221-8232
- Common mental disorders in asylum seekers and refugees: umbrella review of prevalence and intervention studies.Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017; 11: 51
- Precarious employment and health in the context of COVID-19: a rapid scoping umbrella review.Eur J Public Health. 2021; 31: iv40-iv49
- Effects of chronic physical activity on cognition across the lifespan: a systematic meta-review of randomized controlled trials and realist synthesis of contextualized mechanisms.Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2021; : 1-39
- Genetic and non-genetic risk factors for pre-eclampsia: umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 51: 720-730
- Environmental and genetic risk factors of congenital anomalies: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.J Korean Med Sci. 2021; 36: e183
- Molecular genetics of substance use disorders: an umbrella review.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021; 124: 358-369
- Genetic susceptibility of lung cancer in Chinese population: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.J Evid Based Med. 2017; 10: 207-211
- Does health and social care provision for the community dwelling older population help to reduce unplanned secondary care, support timely discharge and improve patient well-being? A mixed method meta-review of systematic reviews.F1000Research. 2020; 9: 857
- Retrieval of overviews of systematic reviews in MEDLINE was improved by the development of an objectively derived and validated search strategy.J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 74: 107-118
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Declarations of interests: All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Data availability statement: The full updated dataset of overview studies is available at Center for Open Science (OSF) (https://osf.io/cnq6h/).