Advertisement

JBI series paper 2: tailored evidence synthesis approaches are required to answer diverse questions: a pragmatic evidence synthesis toolkit from JBI

      Abstract

      Evidence synthesis is critical in evidence-based healthcare and is a core program of JBI. JBI evidence synthesis is characterised by a pluralistic view of what constitutes evidence and is underpinned by a pragmatic ethos to facilitate the use of evidence to inform practice and policy. This second paper in this series provides a descriptive overview of the JBI evidence synthesis toolkit with reference to resources for 11 different types of reviews. Unique methodologies such as qualitative syntheses, mixed methods reviews, and scoping reviews are highlighted. Key features include standardised and collaborative processes for development of methodologies and a broad range of tailored resources to facilitate the conduct of a JBI evidence synthesis, including appraisal and data extraction tools, software to support the conduct of a systematic review and an intensive systematic review training program. JBI is one of the leading international protagonists for evidence synthesis, providing those who want to answer health-related questions with a toolkit of resources to synthesize the evidence.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. JBI Series Paper 1: Introducing JBI and the JBI Model of EHBC.

      2. Lockwood C., Munn Z., Jordan Z., Pilla B., Alves de Araújo Püschel V., Borges dos Santos K. JBI series paper 3: The importance of people, process, evidence, and technology in pragmatic, healthcare provider-led evidence implementation. J Clin Epidemiol 2022. [epub ahead of print].

        • Jordan Z.
        • Lockwood C.
        • Munn Z.
        • Aromataris E.
        The updated Joanna Briggs Institute model of evidence-based healthcare.
        Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2019; 17: 58-71
        • Aromataris E.
        • Munn Z.
        JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis: JBI.
        (Available at)
        https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
        Date: 2020
        Date accessed: March 31, 2021
        • Hannes K.
        • Lockwood C.
        Pragmatism as the philosophical foundation for the Joanna Briggs meta-aggregative approach to qualitative evidence synthesis.
        J Adv Nurs. 2011; 67: 1632-1642
        • Kelly L.
        • Cordeiro M.
        Three principles of pragmatism for research on organizational processes.
        Methodological Innov. 2020; 13 (2059799120937242)
        • Dewey J.
        Chapter 1: The influence of Darwinism on philosophy.
        in: Boydston J. Hahn L. The influence of Darwinism on philosophy and other essays. Southern Illinois University Press; 2008, Carbondale, IL1910: 1-215
        • Chalmers I.
        The Cochrane collaboration: preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care.
        Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993; 703 (discussion 63-5): 156-163
        • Moher D.
        • Cook D.J.
        • Eastwood S.
        • Olkin I.
        • Rennie D.
        • Stroup D.F.
        Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses.
        Lancet. 1999; 354: 1896-1900
        • Page M.J.
        • McKenzie J.E.
        • Bossuyt P.M.
        • Boutron I.
        • Hoffmann T.C.
        • Mulrow C.D.
        • et al.
        The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
        BMJ. 2021; 372: n71
        • Munn Z.
        • Stern C.
        • Aromataris E.
        • Lockwood C.
        • Jordan Z.
        What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018; 18: 5
        • McArthur A.
        • Klugarova J.
        • Yan H.
        • Florescu S.
        Chapter 4: Systematic reviews of text and opinion.
        in: Aromataris E. Munn Z. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020 (Available at)
        https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
        Date accessed: June 29, 2021
        • Pearson A.
        Balancing the evidence: incorporating the synthesis of qualitative data into systematic reviews.
        JBI Rep. 2004; 2: 45-64
        • Lockwood C.
        • Porrit K.
        • Munn Z.
        • Rittenmeyer L.
        • Salmond S.
        • et al.
        Chapter 2: Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence.
        in: Aromataris E Munn Z JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020 (Available at)
        https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
        Date accessed: June 29, 2021
        • Tufanaru C.
        • Munn Z.
        • Aromataris E.
        • Campbell J.
        • Hopp L.
        Chapter 3: systematic reviews of effectiveness.
        in: Aromataris E Munn Z JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020 (Available at)
        https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
        Date accessed: June 29, 2021
        • Munn Z.
        • Moola S.
        • Lisy K.
        • Riitano D.
        • Tufanaru C.
        Chapter 5: Systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence.
        in: Aromataris E. Munn Z. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020 (Available at)
        https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
        Date accessed: June 29, 2021
        • Gomersall J.S.
        • Jadotte Y.T.
        • Xue Y.
        • Lockwood S.
        • Riddle D.
        • Preda A.
        Chapter 6: The systematic review of economic evaluation evidence.
        in: Aromataris E Munn Z JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020 (Available at)
        https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
        Date accessed: June 29, 2021
        • Moola S.
        • Munn Z.
        • Tufanaru C.
        • Aromataris E.
        • Sears K.
        • Sfetcu R.
        Chapter 7: Systematic reviews of etiology and risk.
        in: Aromataris E Munn Z JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020 (Available at)
        https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
        Date accessed: June 29, 2021
        • Lizarondo L.
        • Stern C.
        • Carrier J.
        • Godfrey C.
        • Rieger K.
        • Salmond S.
        Chapter 8: Mixed methods systematic reviews.
        in: Aromataris E. Munn Z. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020 (Available at)
        https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
        Date accessed: June 29, 2021
        • Campbell J.M.
        • Kulgar M.
        • Ding S.
        • Carmody D.P.
        • Hakonsen S.J.
        • Jadotte Y.T.
        • et al.
        Chapter 9: Diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews.
        in: Aromataris E Munn Z JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020 (Available at)
        https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
        Date accessed: June 29, 2021
        • Aromataris E.
        • Fernandez R.
        • Godfrey C.
        • Holly C.
        • Khalil H.
        • Tungpunkom P.
        Chapter 10: Umbrella Reviews.
        in: Aromataris E. Munn Z. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020 (Available at)
        https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
        Date accessed: June 29, 2021
        • Peters M.D.J.
        • Godfrey C.
        • McInerney P.
        • Munn Z.
        • Tricco A.
        • Khalil H.
        Chapter 11: scoping reviews.
        in: Aromataris E. Munn Z. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI, 2020 (Available at)
        https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
        Date accessed: June 29, 2021
        • Stephenson M.
        • Riitano D.
        • Wilson S.
        • Leonardi-Bee J.
        • Mabire C.
        • Cooper K.
        • et al.
        Chapter 12: Systematic reviews of measurement properties.
        in: Aromataris E. Munn Z. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020 (Available at)
        https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
        Date accessed: June 29, 2021
        • Kynoch K.
        • Ramis M.-A.
        • McArdle A.
        Experiences and needs of families with a relative admitted to an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review of qualitative studies.
        JBI Evid Synth. 2021; 19: 1499-1554
        • Stern C.
        • Lizarondo L.
        • Carrier J.
        • Godfrey C.
        • Rieger K.
        • Salmond S.
        • et al.
        Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews.
        JBI Evid Synth. 2020; 18: 2108-2118
        • Gagnier J.J.
        • Moher D.
        • Boon H.
        • Beyene J.
        • Bombardier C.
        Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12: 111
        • Munn Z.
        • Moola S.
        • Lisy K.
        • Riitano D.
        • Tufanaru C.
        Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data.
        Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015; 13: 147-153
        • Munn Z.
        • Moola S.
        • Riitano D.
        • Lisy K.
        The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence.
        Int J Health Pol Manag. 2014; 3: 123-128
      3. Joanna Briggs Institute reviewer’s manual 2008 edition. Adelaide, Australia, JBI. 2008.

        • Gomersall J.S.
        • Jadotte Y.T.
        • Xue Y.
        • Lockwood S.
        • Riddle D.
        • Preda A.
        Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations.
        Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015; 13: 170-178
        • Peters M.D.J.
        • Marnie C.
        • Tricco A.C.
        • Pollock D.
        • Munn Z.
        • Alexander L.
        • et al.
        Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
        JBI Evid Synth. 2020; 18: 2119-2126
        • Munn Z.
        • Porritt K.
        • Lockwood C.
        • Aromataris E.
        • Pearson A.
        Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014; 14: 108
        • Lewin S.
        • Booth A.
        • Glenton C.
        • Munthe-Kaas H.
        • Rashidian A.
        • Wainwright M.
        • et al.
        Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series.
        Implement Sci. 2018; 13: 2
        • JBI
        JBI methodology groups: JBI.
        (Available at)
      4. Pilla B., Jordan Z., Christian R., Kynoch K., McInerney P., Cooper K. JBI series paper 4: The role of collaborative evidence networks in promoting and supporting evidence-based healthcare globally: reflections from 25 years across 38 countries. J Clin Epidemiol 2022. [epub ahead of print].

        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Oxman A.D.
        • Vist G.E.
        • Kunz R.
        • Falck-Ytter Y.
        • Alonso-Coello P.
        • et al.
        GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.
        BMJ. 2008; 336: 924-926
        • Hannes K.
        • Lockwood C.
        • Pearson A.
        A comparative analysis of three online appraisal instruments’ ability to assess validity in qualitative research.
        Qual Health Res. 2010; 20: 1736-1743
        • JBI
        Critical appraisal tools: JBI.
        (Available at)
        https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools
        Date: 2021
        Date accessed: March 31, 2021
        • Munn Z.
        • Barker T.H.
        • Moola S.
        • Tufanaru C.
        • Stern C.
        • McArthur A.
        • et al.
        Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool.
        JBI Evid Synth. 2020; 18: 2127-2133
        • Furuya-Kanamori L.
        • Xu C.
        • Hasan S.S.
        • Doi S.A.
        Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 129: 172-175
        • Munn Z.
        • Aromataris E.
        • Tufanaru C.
        • Stern C.
        • Porritt K.
        • Farrow J.
        • et al.
        The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute system for the unified management, assessment and review of information (JBI SUMARI).
        Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2019; 17: 36-43
        • Stern C.
        • Munn Z.
        • Porritt K.
        • Lockwood C.
        • Peters M.D.J.
        • Bellman S.
        • et al.
        An international educational training course for conducting systematic reviews in health care: the Joanna Briggs Institute’s comprehensive systematic review training program.
        Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2018; 15: 401-408