Over the last decade, multiple authoritative organizations have recommended limiting
the consumption of unprocessed red meat and processed meat.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC: U.S2015 (DecemberAccessed at)
World Cancer Research Fund; American Institute for Cancer Research. Meat, fish and dairy products and the risk of cancer. Continuous Update Project Expert Report 2019. 2019. Accessed at: www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer on 05 July 2020.
- Methods for trustworthy nutritional recommendations NutriRECS (Nutritional Recommendations and accessible Evidence summaries Composed of Systematic reviews): a protocol.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018; 18: 162
- Reduction of red and processed meat intake and cancer mortality and incidence. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.Ann Intern Med. 2019; 171: 711-720
- Patterns of red and processed meat consumption and risk for cardiometabolic and cancer outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.Ann Intern Med. 2019; 171: 732-741
- Effect of lower versus higher red meat intake on cardiometabolic and cancer outcomes. A systematic review of randomized trials.Ann Intern Med. 2019; 171: 721-731
- Red and processed meat consumption and risk for all-cause mortality and cardiometabolic outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.Ann Intern Med. 2019; 171: 703-710
- Health-related values and preferences regarding meat consumption. A mixed-methods systematic review.Ann Intern Med. 2019; 171: 742-755
- The philosophy of evidence-based principles and practice in nutrition.Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2019; 3: 189-199
- Unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: Dietary guideline recommendations from the Nutritional RECommendationS (NutriRECS) Consortium.Ann Intern Med. 2019; (Oct 1)https://doi.org/10.7326/M19-1621
- Backlash over meat dietary recommendations raises questions about corporate ties to nutrition scientists.JAMA. 2020; (Jan 15)https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.21441
- "Positive" results increase down the hierarchy of the sciences.PLoS One. 2010; 5 (Published 2010 Apr 7): e10068https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010068
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.BMJ. 2004; 328: 1490
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.BMJ. 2008; 336: 924-926
- GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 380-382
- Intake of saturated and trans unsaturated fatty acids and risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.BMJ. 2015; 351 (Published 2015 Aug 11): h3978https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3978
- GRADE guidelines for environmental and occupational health: A new series of articles in Environment International.Environ Int. 2019; 128: 11
- Hierarchies of evidence applied to lifestyle Medicine (HEALM): introduction of a strength-of-evidence approach based on a methodological systematic review.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019; 19: 178
- Red and processed meat consumption and risk for all-cause mortality and cardiometabolic outcomes.Ann Intern Med. 2020; 172: 511-512https://doi.org/10.7326/L20-0070
- Perspective: nutrigrade: a scoring system to assess and judge the meta-evidence of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in nutrition research.Adv Nutr. 2017; 8 (Published 2017 Sep 15): 789-790https://doi.org/10.3945/an.117.016188
- Use of the GRADE approach in health policymaking and evaluation: a scoping review of nutrition and physical activity policies.Implement Sci. 2020; 15 (Published 2020 May 24): 37https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-00984-2
- Perspective: nutrigrade: a scoring system to assess and judge the meta-evidence of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in nutrition research.Adv Nutr. 2016; 7: 994-1004
- Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence.Eur J Nutr. 2021; 60: 2893-2903
- Use of GRADE in evidence syntheses published in high-impact-factor nutrition journals: a methodological survey.J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 135 (Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33588024): 54-69https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.010
- Comparison of dietary macronutrient patterns of 14 popular named dietary programmes for weight and cardiovascular risk factor reduction in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.BMJ. 2020; 369 (Published 2020 Apr 1. doi:10.1136/bmj.m696): m696
- Eat Well, Live Well.Health Canada, Ottawa2019 (Accessed at)
- Comparison of evidence of treatment effects in randomized and nonrandomized studies.JAMA. 2001; 286: 821-830https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.7.821
- Can the learning health care system be educated with observational data?.JAMA. 2014; 312: 129-130https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.4364
- Causal inference, interpreting and communicating results on red and processed meat.Am J Clin Nutr. 2020; 111: 1107-1108https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa043
- Evidence collection and evaluation for the development of dietary guidelines and public policy on nutrition.Annu Rev Nutr. 2019; 39: 227-247https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-082018-124610
Article info
Publication history
Published online: July 14, 2021
Accepted:
July 12,
2021
Identification
Copyright
© 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
