GRADE Concept Paper 1: Validating the “F.A.C.E” instrument using stakeholder perceptions of feasibility, acceptability, cost, and equity in guideline implement

Published:November 30, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.018

      Abstract

      Background and Objective

      To present a structured approach for assessing stakeholder perceptions and implementing the approach in guideline development.

      Methods

      This work was carried out by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Equity and Stakeholder Engagement Project Groups through brainstorming and iterative frameworks, stakeholder engagement, pilot testing, refinement of ideas, using input from workshops, and discussions at GRADE Working Group meetings to produce this document, which constitutes a GRADE conceptual article on implementation.

      Results

      We introduce the FACE implementation criteria, feasibility, acceptability, cost, and equity; priority; and “intent to implement” criterion. We outline the implementation importance of networks and approaches to patient and other stakeholder engagement. Implementation is often highly contextual and can benefit from stakeholder engagement and other assessments. Our FACE approach provides stakeholder questions and language to inform guideline implementation and tools.

      Conclusion

      The FACE criteria propose a series of knowledge translation questions to guide the assessment of implementation for evidence-based guidelines. It is desirable for guideline developers to use a conceptual approach, such as FACE, to tailor implementation and inform end of guideline dissemination and knowledge translation activities.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Kastner M.
        • Bhattacharyya O.
        • Hayden L.
        • Makarski J.
        • Estey E.
        • Durocher L.
        • et al.
        Guideline uptake is influenced by six implementability domains for creating and communicating guidelines: a realist review.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2015; 68: 498-509
        • Vandvik P.O.
        • Brandt L.
        Future of Evidence Ecosystem Series: evidence ecosystems and learning health systems: why bother?.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2020; 123: 166-170
        • Selby P.
        • Hunter K.
        • Rogers J.
        • Lang-Robertson K.
        • Soklaridis S.
        • Chow V.
        • et al.
        How to adapt existing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: a case example with smoking cessation guidelines in Canada.
        BMJ Open. 2017; 7: e016124
        • Boutron I.
        • Créquit P.
        • Williams H.
        • Meerpohl J.
        • Craig J.C.
        • Ravaud P.
        Future of evidence ecosystem series: 1. Introduction—evidence synthesis ecosystem needs dramatic change.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2020; 51: 1858-1862
        • Cartabellotta A.
        • Tilson J.K.
        The ecosystem of evidence cannot thrive without efficiency of knowledge generation, synthesis, and translation.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2019; 110: 90-95
        • Gagliardi A.R.
        • Armstrong M.J.
        • Bernhardsson S.
        • Fleuren M.
        • Pardo-Hernandez H.
        • Vernooij R.W.
        • et al.
        The Clinician Guideline Determinants Questionnaire was developed and validated to support tailored implementation planning.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2019; 113: 129-136
        • Stone D.A.
        Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas.
        Polit Sci Q. 1989; 104: 281-300
        • Gagliardi A.R.
        • Marshall C.
        • Huckson S.
        • James R.
        • Moore V.
        Developing a checklist for guideline implementation planning: review and synthesis of guideline development and implementation advice.
        Implement Sci. 2015; 10: 19
        • Davis D.
        • Goldman J.
        • Palda V.A.
        Handbook on clinical practice guidelines.
        Canadian Medical Association, Ottawa, Ontario2007 (2014)
        • Grimshaw J.M.
        • Schünemann H.J.
        • Burgers J.
        • Cruz A.A.
        • Heffner J.
        • Metersky M.
        • et al.
        Disseminating and implementing guidelines: article 13 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
        Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012; 9: 298-303
        • Wilson K.C.
        • Irwin R.S.
        • File Jr., T.M.
        • Schünemann H.J.
        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Rabe K.F.
        Reporting and publishing guidelines: article 12 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
        Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012; 9: 293-297
        • Schünemann H.J.
        • Wiercioch W.
        • Etxeandia I.
        • Falavigna M.
        • Santesso N.
        • Mustafa R.
        • et al.
        Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise.
        Cmaj. 2014; 186: E123-E142
        • Cluzeau F.
        • Wedzicha J.A.
        • Kelson M.
        • Corn J.
        • Kunz R.
        • Walsh J.
        • et al.
        Stakeholder involvement: how to do it right: article 9 in integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
        Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012; 9: 269-273
        • Ross-Degnan D.
        • Laing R.
        • Santoso B.
        • Ofori-Adjei D.
        • Lamoureux C.
        • Hogerzeil H.
        Improving pharmaceutical use in primary care in developing countries: a critical review of experience and lack of experience.
        (International Conference on Improving Use of Medicines, Chiang Mai, Thailand)1997: 1-4
        • SAGE
        Report to SAGE on reducing pain and distress at the time of vaccination.
        (Available at)
        • Schünemann H.J.
        • Mustafa R.
        • Brozek J.
        • Santesso N.
        • Alonso-Coello P.
        • Guyatt G.
        • et al.
        GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 76: 89-98
        • WHO
        Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care for key populations.
        WHO, Geneva, Switzerland2014
        • Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health
        Recommendations on hepatitis C screening for adults. Vol. 189, Canadian Medical Association Journal.
        (E594 LP–E604. Report No.: 16. Available at)
        • European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
        Public health guidance on screening and vaccination for infectious diseases in newly arrived migrants within the EU/EEA.
        (Available at)
        • Alonso-Coello P.
        • Schünemann H.J.
        • Moberg J.
        • Brignardello-Petersen R.
        • Akl E.A.
        • Davoli M.
        • et al.
        GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction.
        BMJ. 2016; 353: i2016
        • Glenton C.
        • Lewin S.
        • Lawrie T.A.
        • Barreix M.
        • Downe S.
        • Finlayson K.W.
        • et al.
        Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) for Guidelines: paper 3–Using qualitative evidence syntheses to develop implementation considerations and inform implementation processes.
        Health Res Policy Syst. 2019; 17: 74
        • Lewin S.
        • Glenton C.
        • Munthe-Kaas H.
        • Carlsen B.
        • Colvin C.J.
        • Gülmezoglu M.
        • et al.
        Using qualitative evidence in decision making for health and social interventions: an approach to assess confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses (GRADE-CERQual).
        PLoS Med. 2015; 12: e1001895
        • Magwood O.
        • Leki V.Y.
        • Kpade V.
        • Saad A.
        • Alkhateeb Q.
        • Gebremeskel A.
        • et al.
        Common trust and personal safety issues: a systematic review on the acceptability of health and social interventions for persons with lived experience of homelessness.
        PLoS One. 2019; 14: e0226306
        • Magwood O.
        • Kpade V.
        • Thavorn K.
        • Oliver S.
        • Mayhew A.D.
        • Pottie K.
        Effectiveness of home-based records on maternal, newborn and child health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        PLoS One. 2019; 14: e0209278
        • Magwood O.
        • Hanemaayer A.
        • Saad A.
        • Salvalaggio G.
        • Bloch G.
        • Moledina A.
        Determinants of implementation of clinical practice guidelines for marginalized populations: a mixed-method study of evidence based guidelines for homeless health.
        Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17: 7938
        • Benoit F.
        Public policy models and their usefulness in public health: the stages model.
        (National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy, Institut national ldots)2013
        • Proctor E.
        • Silmere H.
        • Raghavan R.
        • Hovmand P.
        • Aarons G.
        • Bunger A.
        • et al.
        Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda.
        Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011; 38: 65-76
        • Pottie K.
        • Siu W.
        • Duclos P.
        • Antwi-Agyei K.O.
        • Chambers C.
        • Goubert L.
        • et al.
        New recommendations to prevent pain during immunizations: WHO position paper-September 2015.
        Vaccine. 2016; 34: 3627-3628
        • Woodward E.N.
        • Matthieu M.M.
        • Uchendu U.S.
        • Rogal S.
        • Kirchner J.E.
        The health equity implementation framework: proposal and preliminary study of hepatitis C virus treatment.
        Implement Sci. 2019; 14: 26
        • Farmer P.
        On suffering and structural violence: social and economic rights in the global era.
        in: Pathologies of power: health, human rights, and the new war on the poor. University of California Press, Berkeley2003
        • Welch V.A.
        • Akl E.A.
        • Pottie K.
        • Ansari M.T.
        • Briel M.
        • Christensen R.
        • et al.
        GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 90: 76-83
        • Pottie K.
        • Welch V.
        • Morton R.
        • Akl E.A.
        • Eslava-Schmalbach J.H.
        • Katikireddi V.
        • et al.
        GRADE Equity Guidelines 4: guidance on how to assess and address health equity within the evidence to decision process.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 90: 84
        • Sabatier P.A.
        • Mazmanian D.
        A conceptual framework of the implementation process.
        Public Policy Essent Read. 1995; : 153-173
        • Akl E.A.
        • Welch V.
        • Pottie K.
        • Eslava-Schmalbach J.
        • Darzi A.
        • Sola I.
        • et al.
        GRADE equity guidelines 2: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: equity extension of the guideline development checklist.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 90: 68-75
        • Pottie K.
        • Kendall C.E.
        • Aubry T.
        • Magwood O.
        • Andermann A.
        • Salvalaggio G.
        • et al.
        Clinical guideline for homeless and vulnerably housed people, and people with lived homelessness experience.
        CMAJ. 2020; 192: E240-E254
        • Schünemann H.J.
        • Wiercioch W.
        • Brozek J.
        • Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I.
        • Mustafa R.A.
        • Manja V.
        • et al.
        GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 81: 101-110
        • Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
        Recommendations on behavioural interventions for the prevention and treatment of cigarette smoking among school-aged children and youth.
        CMAJ. 2017; 189: E310-E316
        • Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
        Recommendations on screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in primary care.
        CMAJ. 2017; 189: E1137-E1145
        • Wilson B.J.
        • Courage S.
        • Bacchus M.
        • Dickinson J.A.
        • Klarenbach S.
        • Garcia A.J.
        • et al.
        Screening for impaired vision in community-dwelling adults aged 65 years and older in primary care settings.
        CMAJ. 2018; 190: E588-E594