Advertisement
Commentary| Volume 129, P191-197, January 2021

Methods for prospectively incorporating gender into health sciences research

Published:September 23, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.08.018

      Highlights

      • Sex, a biological construct, and gender, a social construct are two distinct variables that may independently influence human health.
      • Despite calls for inclusion of sex and gender into health sciences research, gender is often ignored or conflated with sex.
      • In this commentary, we provide clarification of the distinction between these two variables and concrete examples of gender-related variables that can be collected under the four domains of gender identity, gender roles, gender relations, and institutionalized gender.
      • We also provide methods for incorporating these variables into statistical analysis.
      • We hope these guidelines will help researchers in their efforts to incorporate gender into their studies, thereby meeting requirements of funding agencies and ultimately improving health equity and precision medicine.

      Abstract

      Numerous studies have demonstrated that sex (a biological variable) and gender (a psychosocial construct) impact health and have discussed the mechanisms that may explain these relationships. Funding agencies have called for all health researchers to incorporate sex and gender into their studies; however, the way forward has been unclear to many, particularly due to the varied definition of gender. We argue that just as there is no standardized definition of gender, there can be no standardized measurement thereof. However, numerous measurable gender-related variables may influence individual or population-level health through various pathways. The initial question should guide the selection of specific gender-related variables based on their relevance to the study, to prospectively incorporate gender into research. We outline various methods to provide clarification on how to incorporate gender into the design of prospective clinical and epidemiological studies as well as methods for statistical analysis.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Science is Better with Sex and Gender; Strategic Plan 2018-2023 Ottawa ON: Canadian Institutes of Health Research Intitute of Gender and Health.
        (Available at:)
        http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/51310.html
        Date: 2018
        Date accessed: April 1, 2020
        • Johnson J.
        • Greaves L.
        • Repta R.
        Better science with sex and gender: A primer for health research.
        in: Network WsHR. Women's Health Research Network, Vancouver, Canada2007
        • Gahagan J.
        • Gray K.
        • Whynacht A.
        Sex and gender matter in health research: addressing health inequities in health research reporting.
        Int J Equity Health. 2015; 14: 12
        • Krieger N.
        Genders, sexes, and health: what are the connections—and why does it matter?.
        Int J Epidemiol. 2003; 32: 652-657
        • Regitz-Zagrosek V.
        Sex and gender differences in health.
        EMBO Rep. 2012; 13: 596-603
        • Khan N.A.
        • Daskalopoulou S.S.
        • Karp I.
        • Eisenberg M.J.
        • Pelletier R.
        • Tsadok M.A.
        • et al.
        Sex differences in acute coronary syndrome symptom presentation in young patients.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173: 1863-1871
        • Pelletier R.
        • Khan N.A.
        • Cox J.
        • Daskalopoulou S.S.
        • Eisenberg M.J.
        • Bacon S.L.
        • et al.
        Sex versus gender-related characteristics: which predicts outcome after acute coronary syndrome in the young?.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67: 127-135
        • Tannenbaum C.
        • Ellis R.P.
        • Eyssel F.
        • Zou J.
        • Schiebinger L.
        Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering.
        Nature. 2019; 575: 137-146
      2. How Sex/Gender Influence Health & Disease (A-Z) National Institutes of Health Office of Research on Women's Health.
        (Available at:)
      3. Promoting Gender Equality in Research and Innovation Horizon 2020.
        (Available at:)
        • Weber A.M.
        • Cislaghi B.
        • Meausoone V.
        • Abdalla S.
        • Mejía-Guevara I.
        • Loftus P.
        • et al.
        Gender norms and health: insights from global survey data.
        Lancet. 2019;
        • Bekker M.H.J.
        Investigating gender within health research is more than sex disaggregation of data: a Multi-Facet Gender and Health Model.
        Psychol Health Med. 2003; 8: 231-243
        • Labots G.
        • Jones A.
        • de Visser S.J.
        • Rissmann R.
        • Burggraaf J.
        Gender differences in clinical registration trials: is there a real problem?.
        Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018; 84: 700-707
        • Nowatzki N.
        • Grant K.R.
        Sex is not enough: the need for gender-based analysis in health research.
        Health Care Women Int. 2011; 32: 263-277
        • Phellas C.N.
        • Bloch A.
        • Seale C.
        Structured methods: interviews, questionnaires and observation.
        Research Soc Cult. 2011; 3: 181-205
        • Ellis R.
        • Virgile M.
        • Holzberg J.
        • Nelson D.V.
        • Edgar J.
        • Phipps P.
        • et al.
        Assessing the Feasibility of Asking Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the Current Population Survey: Results from Cognitive Interviews.
        Center for Survey Measurement, US Census Bureau and Office of Survey Methods Research, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC2017
        • Holzberg J.
        • Ellis R.
        • Virgile M.
        • Nelson D.
        • Edgar J.
        • Phipps P.
        • et al.
        Assessing the Feasibility of Asking about Gender Identity in the Current Population Survey: Results from Focus Groups with Members of the Transgender Population.
        Center for Survey Measurement, U.S. Census Bureau and Office of Survey Methods Research, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC2017
        • Bem S.L.
        The measurement of psychological androgyny.
        J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974; 42: 155
        • Weisberg Y.
        • DeYoung C.
        • Hirsh J.
        Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the Big five.
        Front Psychol. 2011; 2
        • Sorenson P.S.
        • Hawkins K.
        • Sorenson R.L.
        Gender, psychological type and conflict style preference.
        Manag Commun Q. 1995; 9: 115-126
        • Pelletier R.
        • Ditto B.
        • Pilote L.
        A composite measure of gender and its association with risk factors in patients with premature acute coronary syndrome.
        Psychosom Med. 2015; 77: 517-526
        • Mitchell P.H.
        • Powell L.
        • Blumenthal J.
        • Norten J.
        • Ironson G.
        • Pitula C.R.
        • et al.
        A short social support measure for patients recovering from myocardial infarction: the ENRICHD Social Support Inventory.
        J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2003; 23: 398-403
        • Vaglio Jr., J.
        • Conard M.
        • Poston W.S.
        • O'Keefe J.
        • Haddock C.K.
        • House J.
        • et al.
        Testing the performance of the ENRICHD social support instrument in cardiac patients.
        Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004; 2: 24
        • Markey C.N.
        • Markey P.M.
        • Schneider C.
        • Brownlee S.
        Marital status and health beliefs: different relations for men and women.
        Sex Roles. 2005; 53: 443-451
        • Juster R.-P.
        • de Torre M.B.
        • Kerr P.
        • Kheloui S.
        • Rossi M.
        • Bourdon O.
        Sex differences and gender diversity in stress responses and allostatic load among workers and LGBT people.
        Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019; 21: 110
        • Chung D.
        Violence, control, romance and gender equality: young women and heterosexual relationships.
        Women's Stud Int Forum. 2005; 28: 445-455
        • Klein R.
        Sickening relationships: gender-based violence, Women’s health, and the role of informal third parties.
        J Soc Pers Relat. 2004; 21: 149-165
        • Programme U.N.D.
        Human Development Report 2019 Beyond income, beyond averages, beyond today:Inequalities in human development in the 21st century.
        Center for Survey Measurement, U.S. Census Bureau and Office of Survey Methods Research, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC2019
        • Equity EIfG
        Gender equality index 2019.
        (Available at:)
        • Shen H.
        Inequality quantified: mind the gender gap.
        Nature. 2013; 495: 22-24
        • Lundine J.
        • Bourgeault I.L.
        • Clark J.
        • Heidari S.
        • Balabanova D.
        The gendered system of academic publishing.
        Lancet. 2018; 391: 1754-1756
        • Lacasse A.
        • Pagé M.G.
        • Choinière M.
        • Dorais M.
        • Vissandjée B.
        • Nguefack H.L.N.
        • et al.
        Conducting gender-based analysis of existing databases when self-reported gender data are unavailable: the GENDER Index in a working population.
        Can J Public Health. 2020; : 1-14
        • Smith P.M.
        • Koehoorn M.
        Measuring gender when you don’t have a gender measure: constructing a gender index using survey data.
        Int J Equity Health. 2016; 15: 82
        • Fabrigar L.R.
        • Wegener D.T.
        • MacCallum R.C.
        • Strahan E.J.
        Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research.
        Psychol Methods. 1999; 4: 272
        • MacKinnon D.P.
        • Fairchild A.J.
        • Fritz M.S.
        Mediation analysis.
        Annu Rev Psychol. 2006; 58: 593-614
        • Kang S.-Y.
        • Deren S.
        Factors mediating and moderating the relationship between gender and utilization of health care among Puerto Rican drug users in New York.
        Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009; 102: 138-143
        • Abrahamowicz M.
        • Beauchamp M.E.
        • Fournier P.
        • Dumont A.
        Evidence of subgroup-specific treatment effect in the absence of an overall effect: is there really a contradiction?.
        Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013; 22: 1178-1188