Series: GRADE Equity Guidelines| Volume 90, P84-91, October 2017

GRADE equity guidelines 4: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: evidence to decision process



      The aim of this paper is to provide detailed guidance on how to incorporate health equity within the GRADE (Grading Recommendations Assessment and Development Evidence) evidence to decision process.

      Study Design and Setting

      We developed this guidance based on the GRADE evidence to decision framework, iteratively reviewing and modifying draft documents, in person discussion of project group members and input from other GRADE members.


      Considering the impact on health equity may be required, both in general guidelines and guidelines that focus on disadvantaged populations. We suggest two approaches to incorporate equity considerations: (1) assessing the potential impact of interventions on equity and (2) incorporating equity considerations when judging or weighing each of the evidence to decision criteria. We provide guidance and include illustrative examples.


      Guideline panels should consider the impact of recommendations on health equity with attention to remote and underserviced settings and disadvantaged populations. Guideline panels may wish to incorporate equity judgments across the evidence to decision framework. This is the fourth and final paper in a series about considering equity in the GRADE guideline development process. This series is coming from the GRADE equity subgroup.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Dans A.M.
        • D L.
        • Oxman A.D.
        • Robinson V.
        • Acuin J.
        • Tugwell P.
        • et al.
        Assessing equity in clinical practice guidelines.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60: 540-546
        • Alonso-Coello P.
        • Oxman A.D.
        • Moberg J.
        • Brignardello-Petersen R.
        • Akl E.A.
        • Davoli M.
        • et al.
        GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: clinical practice guidelines.
        BMJ. 2016; 353: i2089
        • Schünemann H.
        • Mustafa R.
        • Brozek J.
        • Santesso N.
        • Alonso-Coello P.
        • Guyatt G.
        • et al.
        GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 76: 89-98
        • World Health Organization
        Guidelines for the screening, care and treatment of persons with chronic hepatitis c infection.
        World Health Organization, Geneva2014
        • World Health Organization
        WHO handbook for guideline development.
        2nd ed. World Health Organization, Geneva2014
        • O'Neill J.
        • Tabish H.
        • Welch V.
        • Petticrew M.
        • Pottie K.
        • Clarke M.
        • et al.
        Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 67: 56-64
        • Welch V.A.
        • Akl E.A.
        • Guyatt G.
        • Pottie K.
        • Eslava-Schmalbach J.
        • Ansari M.T.
        • et al.
        GRADE equity guidelines 1: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: introduction and rationale.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 90: 59-67
        • Akl E.A.
        • Welch V.
        • Pottie K.
        • Eslava-Schmalbach J.
        • Darzi A.
        • Sola I.
        • et al.
        GRADE equity guidelines 2: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: equity extension of the guideline development checklist.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 90: 68-75
        • Welch V.A.
        • Akl E.A.
        • Pottie K.
        • Ansari M.T.
        • Briel M.
        • Christensen R.
        • et al.
        GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 90: 76-83
        • Pottie Kevin
        • Greenaway Christina
        • Feightner John
        • Welch Vivian
        • Swinkels Helena
        • Rashid Meb
        • et al.
        Evidence-based clinical guidelines for immigrants and refugees.
        Can Med Assoc J. 2011; 183: e824-e925
        • Oxman A.
        • Schunemann H.
        • Fretheim A.
        Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 12. Incorporating considerations of equity.
        Heal Res Policy Syst. 2006; 4: 24
        • World Health Organization
        WHO handbook for guideline development.
        World Health Organization, Geneva2006
      1. Moberg J, Alonso-Coello P OA. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) Frameworks Guidance. Version 1.1 [updated May 2015] 2015. Available at

        • Canadian Task Force for Preventive Health Care
        Hepatitis C guidelines.
        CMAJ. 2017; 189: E594-E604
        • Marmot M.
        The Marmot review final report: Fair society, healthy lives.
        2010 (Available at)
        • Kristjansson E.
        • Francis D.K.
        • Liberato S.
        • Benkhalti Jandu M.
        • Welch V.
        • Batal M.
        • et al.
        Feeding interventions for improving the physical and psychosocial health of disadvantaged children aged three months to five years.
        in: Kristjansson E. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK2012
        • Tugwell P.
        • Pottie K.
        • Welch V.
        • Ueffing E.
        • Chambers A.
        • Feightner J.
        Evaluation of evidence-based literature and formulation of recommendations for the clinical preventive guidelines for immigrants and refugees in Canada.
        CMAJ. 2011; 183: E933-E938
        • Schünemann H.J.
        Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, considering review information size or less emphasis on imprecision?.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 75: 6-15
        • Katikireddi S.V.
        • Valles S.A.
        Coupled ethical–Epistemic analysis of public health research and practice: Categorizing Variables to improve population health and equity.
        Am J Public Health. 2015; 105: e36-e42
        • Burnette L.
        • Kickett M.
        Dislocation and dialysis in Aboriginal patients with renal failure Dislocation and dialysis in Aboriginal patients with renal failure.
        Aborig Isl Health Work J. 2009; 33: 10-13
        • Abarca Tomás B.
        • Pell C.
        • Bueno Cavanillas A.
        • Guillén Solvas J.
        • Pool R.
        • Roura M.
        Tuberculosis in migrant populations. A systematic review of the Qualitative literature.
        PLoS One. 2013; 8: e82440
        • Morton R.L.
        • Snelling P.
        • Webster A.C.
        • Rose J.
        • Masterson R.
        • Johnson D.W.
        • et al.
        Factors influencing patient choice of dialysis versus conservative care to treat end-stage kidney disease.
        CMAJ J. 2012; 184: E277-E283
        • Stone N.J.
        • Robinson J.G.
        • Lichtenstein A.H.
        • Bairey Merz C.N.
        • Blum C.B.
        • Eckel R.H.
        • et al.
        2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce Atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in Adults.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63: 2889-2934
        • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
        Colistimethate sodium and tobramycin dry powders for inhalation for treating pseudomonas lung infection in cystic fibrosis.
        2013 (Available at)
      2. Society SAR. Guideline for the optimal care of patients on chronic dialysis in South Africa. Secondary Guideline for the optimal care of patients on chronic dialysis in South Africa. 2015.

        • Magrini N.
        • Robertson J.
        • Forte G.
        • Cappello B.
        • Moja L.P.
        • de Joncheere K.
        • et al.
        Tough decisions on essential medicines in 2015.
        Bull World Health Organ. 2015; 93: 283-284
        • Cookson R.
        • Drummond M.
        • Weatherly H.
        Explicit incorporation of equity considerations into economic evaluation of public health interventions.
        Heal Econ Policy L. 2009; 4: 231
        • Johri M.
        • Norheim O.F.
        Can cost-effectiveness analysis integrate concerns for equity? Systematic review.
        Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012; 28: 125-132
        • HP WMA
        How and why do interventions that increase health overall widen inequalities within populations?.
        in: Babones S. Social Inequality and Public Health. Policy Press Scholarsh Online, Bristol, 2012
        • World Health Organization
        Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Control A guide to essential practice.
        2nd ed. 2014 (Available at
        • World Health Organization
        Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care for key populations.
        • World Health Organization
        Reducing pain at the time of vaccination: WHO position paper - September 2015.
        Relev Epidemiol Hebd. 2015; 90: 505-510
        • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
        Positively equal. A guide to addressing equality issues in developing NICE clinical guidelines.
        2nd ed. 2012 (Available at
        • Verkerk K.
        Considered judgement in evidence-based guideline development.
        Int J Qual Heal Care. 2006; 18: 365-369