Advertisement
Commentary| Volume 84, P30-32, April 2017

Download started.

Ok

A new CONSORT extension should improve the reporting of randomized pilot and feasibility trials

  • Peter Craig
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-141-353-7559; fax: +44-141-332-0725.
    Affiliations
    MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow G2 3QB, UK
    Search for articles by this author
Published:February 15, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.009
      Poor reporting is one of the main reasons why much research effort is wasted [
      • Glasziou P.
      • Altman D.G.
      • Bossuyt P.
      • Boutron I.
      • Clarke M.
      • Julious S.
      • et al.
      Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research.
      ]. Another is inadequate feasibility testing and piloting before an efficacy or effectiveness study is conducted [
      • Thabane L.
      • Ma J.
      • Chu R.
      • Cheng J.
      • Rios L.P.
      • Robson R.
      • et al.
      A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how.
      ]. A new extension to the CONSORT statement seeks to improve the way randomized pilot and feasibility trials are reported [
      • Eldridge S.M.
      • Chan C.L.
      • Campbell M.J.
      • Bond C.M.
      • Hopewell S.
      • Thabane L.
      • et al.
      On behalf of the PAFS consensus group. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomized pilot and feasibility trials.
      ,
      • Eldridge S.M.
      • Chan C.L.
      • Campbell M.J.
      • Bond C.M.
      • Hopewell S.
      • Thabane L.
      • et al.
      On behalf of the PAFS consensus group
      CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomized pilot and feasibility trials.
      ]. Adoption of the extension by journals that publish such trials should encourage its use by researchers, directly improving standards of reporting, and indirectly improving the way pilot and feasibility trials are designed and conducted.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Glasziou P.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Bossuyt P.
        • Boutron I.
        • Clarke M.
        • Julious S.
        • et al.
        Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research.
        Lancet. 2014; 383: 267-276
        • Thabane L.
        • Ma J.
        • Chu R.
        • Cheng J.
        • Rios L.P.
        • Robson R.
        • et al.
        A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10: 1
        • Eldridge S.M.
        • Chan C.L.
        • Campbell M.J.
        • Bond C.M.
        • Hopewell S.
        • Thabane L.
        • et al.
        On behalf of the PAFS consensus group. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomized pilot and feasibility trials.
        Br Med J. 2016; 355: i5239
        • Eldridge S.M.
        • Chan C.L.
        • Campbell M.J.
        • Bond C.M.
        • Hopewell S.
        • Thabane L.
        • et al.
        • On behalf of the PAFS consensus group
        CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomized pilot and feasibility trials.
        Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016; 2: 64
        • Craig P.
        • Dieppe P.
        • Macintyre S.
        • Michie S.
        • Nazareth I.
        • Petticrew M.
        Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.
        Br Med J. 2008; 337: a1655
        • Arain M.
        • Campbell M.J.
        • Cooper C.L.
        • Lancaster G.A.
        What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10: 67
        • Lancaster G.
        • Dodd S.
        • Williamson P.R.
        Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice.
        J Eval Clin Pract. 2002; 102: 307-312
        • Eldridge S.M.
        • Lancaster G.A.
        • Campbell M.J.
        • Thabane L.
        • Hopewell S.
        • Coleman C.L.
        • et al.
        Defining feasibility and pilot studies in preparation for randomized controlled trials: development of a conceptual framework.
        PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0150205
        • Lancaster G.A.
        Pilot and feasibility studies come of age!.
        Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015; 1: 1
        • Westlund E.
        • Stuart A.
        The nonuse, misuse, and proper use of pilot studies in experimental evaluation research.
        Am J Eval. 2016;
      1. Available at http://www.consort-statement.org/about-consort/impact-of-consort. Accessed August 11, 2016.

        • Turner L.
        • Shamseer L.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Schulz K.F.
        • Moher D.
        Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomized controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review.
        Syst Rev. 2012; 1: 60
        • Stevens A.
        • Shamseer L.
        • Weinstein E.
        • Yazdi F.
        • Turner L.
        • Thielman J.
        • et al.
        Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review.
        Br Med J. 2014; 348: g3804