Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyReferences
- Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research.Lancet. 2014; 383: 267-276
- A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10: 1
- On behalf of the PAFS consensus group. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomized pilot and feasibility trials.Br Med J. 2016; 355: i5239
- CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomized pilot and feasibility trials.Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016; 2: 64
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.Br Med J. 2008; 337: a1655
- What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10: 67
- Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice.J Eval Clin Pract. 2002; 102: 307-312
- Defining feasibility and pilot studies in preparation for randomized controlled trials: development of a conceptual framework.PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0150205
- Pilot and feasibility studies come of age!.Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015; 1: 1
- The nonuse, misuse, and proper use of pilot studies in experimental evaluation research.Am J Eval. 2016;
Available at http://www.consort-statement.org/about-consort/impact-of-consort. Accessed August 11, 2016.
- Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomized controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review.Syst Rev. 2012; 1: 60
- Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review.Br Med J. 2014; 348: g3804
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
Funding: P.C. receives core funding from the UK Medical Research Council (funding code: MC_UU_12017/15) and the Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office (funding code: SPHSU15). He was a member of the Feasibility and Pilot Studies Development Group that contributed to the development of the CONSORT extension. Preparation of the commentary did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.