Health care articles with simple and declarative titles were more likely to be in the Altmetric Top 100

  • Nicola Di Girolamo
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Tel.: +39-3292003570; fax: + 39-065124039.
    Affiliations
    Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Tolara di Sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano Emilia, Bologna, Italy

    EBMVet, Via Sigismondo Trecchi 20, Cremona 26100, Italy
    Search for articles by this author
  • Reint Meursinge Reynders
    Affiliations
    Private Practice of Orthodontics, Via Matteo Bandello 15, 20123 Milan, Italy

    Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author
Published:December 27, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.11.018

      Abstract

      Objectives

      The aim of this study was to assess whether specific title characteristics could influence the likelihood of being included in the “Altmetric Top 100.”

      Methods

      We conducted a 1:2 matched case–control study with the cases being the health care articles included in the “Altmetric Top 100” lists (2013–2015) matched through a random computerized procedure with two health care articles published in the same journal and year. For each title, we extracted the number of characters in the title, the number of uncommon words, and whether the title was declarative. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals adjusted for a prespecified baseline confounder (open access).

      Results

      One hundred eight “Medical and health sciences” articles were retrieved in the 2013–2015 “Altmetric Top 100” and matched to 216 control articles. Titles of the “Altmetric Top 100” articles were 102.6 characters (±42) long, included 3.4 (±2.0) uncommon words, and 29.6% (32/108) were “declarative.” Titles of the matched articles were 109.3 characters (±37.1) long, included 4.7 (±2.4) uncommon words, and 21.8% (47/216) were “declarative.” After multivariate adjustment, declarative titles with a lower number of uncommon words were significantly more represented in the Altmetric list, with declarative titles having 2.8 times the odds of being in the top list (OR: 2.8; 95% confidence interval: 1.2, 6.4). For each additional uncommon word in the title, there was a 1.4 increase in the odds of being a non-Altmetric Top 100 article (1.4; 1.2–1.6).

      Conclusion

      An easy-to-understand, informative title may help bridge the gap between scholar and social media dissemination.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Haynes R.B.
        More informative titles.
        ACP J Club. 1994; 121: A10
        • Aronson J.
        When I use a word … Declarative titles.
        QJM. 2010; 103: 207-209
        • Hoang J.K.
        • McCall J.
        • Dixon A.F.
        • Fitzgerald R.T.
        • Gaillard F.
        Using social media to share your radiology research: how effective is a blog post?.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2015; 12: 760-765
        • Orizaola G.
        • Valdés A.E.
        Free the tweet at scientific conferences.
        Science. 2015; 350: 170-171
        • Bosch F.
        • Serés E.
        From scientific advances to public health action: the crucial role of science dissemination.
        J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015; 69: 1-2
        • Priem J.
        • Taraborelli D.
        • Groth P.
        • Neylon C.
        Altmetrics: A manifesto, 26 October 2010.
        2010 (Available at) (Accessed September 1, 2016)
      1. Public Library of Science (PLOS). Available at http://www.lagotto.io/plos/#static-content-wrap. Accessed September 1, 2016.

        • Trueger N.S.
        • Thoma B.
        • Hsu C.H.
        • Sullivan D.
        • Peters L.
        • Lin M.
        The altmetric score: a new measure for article-level dissemination and impact.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2015; 66: 549-553
        • Thelwall M.
        • Haustein S.
        • Larivière V.
        • Sugimoto C.R.
        Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services.
        PLoS One. 2013; 8: e64841
        • Eysenbach G.
        Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact.
        J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13: e123
        • McGowan J.
        • Tugwell P.
        Informative titles described article content.
        J Can Health Libr Assoc. 2005; 26: 83-84
        • Gjersvik P.
        • Nylenna M.
        Declarative titles in original research papers in dermatologic journals 1974-2014.
        J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016; 30: 124-125
        • Rosner J.L.
        Reflections of science as a product.
        Nature. 1990; 345: 108
        • Marder E.
        In numbers we trust?.
        Elife. 2014; 3: e02791
        • Handel M.J.
        Article-level metrics—it's not just about citations.
        J Exp Biol. 2014; 217: 4271-4272
        • Rhee J.S.
        High-impact articles-citations, downloads, and altmetric score.
        JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015; 17: 323-324
        • Evers J.L.
        • Williams A.C.
        Altmetrics, huh?.
        Hum Reprod. 2016; 31: 1
        • Bornmann L.
        Usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research: a case study using data from PLOS and F1000Prime.
        Aslib J Inf Manage. 2015; 67: 305-319
        • Allen H.G.
        • Stanton T.R.
        • Di Pietro F.
        • Moseley G.L.
        Social media release increases dissemination of original articles in the clinical pain sciences.
        PLoS One. 2013; 8: e68914
        • Fox C.S.
        • Bonaca M.A.
        • Ryan J.J.
        • Massaro J.M.
        • Barry K.
        • Loscalzo J.
        A randomized trial of social media from circulation.
        Circulation. 2015; 131: 28-33
        • Muscatello D.J.
        • Searles A.
        • MacDonald R.
        • Jorm L.
        Communicating population health statistics through graphs: a randomised controlled trial of graph design interventions.
        BMC Med. 2006; 4: 33
        • Conti A.A.
        Clin Ter. 2013; 164 ([Article in Italian]): e297-e300
        • Pieterse A.H.
        • Jager N.A.
        • Smets E.M.
        • Henselmans I.
        Lay understanding of common medical terminology in oncology.
        Psychooncology. 2013; 22: 1186-1191