Abstract
Objective
Study Design and Setting
Results
Conclusions
Keywords
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyReferences
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial.Control Clin Trials. 1981; 2: 31-49
- Limitations of the randomized controlled trial in evaluating population-based health interventions.Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33: 155-161
- Time to publication for results of clinical trials.(Review) The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008
- Approaches to data analyses of clinical trials.Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2012; 54: 330-334
NIH Data Sharing Policy and Implementation Guidance, 2013. Available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/data_sharing_guidance.htm. Accessed January 2015.
- Raw data from clinical trials: within reach?.Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013; 34: 645-647
- Sharing clinical trial data: maximizing benefits, minimizing risk.Institute of Medicine, Washington DC2015
- The imperative to share clinical study reports: recommendations from the Tamiflu experience.PLoS Med. 2012; 9: e1001201
- Fundamentals of clinical trials.3rd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York1998
- Problems in the reporting of acne clinical trials: a spot check from the 2009 Annual Evidence Update on Acne Vulgaris.Trials. 2010; 11: 77
- Redundant surgical publications: tip of the iceberg?.Surgery. 2001; 129: 655-661
- Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study.BMJ. 1997; 315: 635-640
- Different patterns of duplicate publication: an analysis of articles used in systematic reviews.JAMA. 2004; 291: 974-980
- Practices and impact of primary outcome adjustment in randomized controlled trials: meta-epidemiologic study.BMJ. 2013; 347: f4313
- Reanalyses of randomized clinical trial data.JAMA. 2014; 312: 1024-1032
- Applied analysis of recurrent events: a practical overview.J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005; 59: 706-710
- Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 1310-1319
- Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 756-765
- A randomized study on the effect of weight loss on obstructive sleep apnea among obese patients with type 2 diabetes: the Sleep AHEAD study.Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169: 1619-1626
- Bivalirudin in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI): 1-year results of a randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2009; 374: 1149-1159
- Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events.N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 1329-1338
- Efficacy and safety of exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure: HF-ACTION randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 2009; 301: 1439-1450
- A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of 5 smoking cessation pharmacotherapies.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009; 66 (Epub 2009 Nov 04): 1253-1262
- Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes.N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 1045-1057
- Methodology of a reevaluation of cardiovascular outcomes in the RECORD trial: study design and conduct.Am Heart J. 2013; 166: 208-216
- Baseline characteristics of the randomised cohort from the Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) study.Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2006; 3: 202-215
- Baseline pain and disability in the investigational vertebroplasty efficacy and safety trial.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009; 30: 1203-1205
- Quality assurance in head and neck surgical oncology: EORTC 24954 trial on larynx preservation.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013; 39: 1013-1018
- Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes in oral agent combination therapy for type 2 diabetes (RECORD): a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial.Lancet. 2009; 373: 2125-2135
- Safety and tolerability of omalizumab in children with allergic (IgE-mediated) asthma.Curr Med Res Opin. 2011; 27: 163-169
- Postoperative infliximab is not associated with an increase in adverse events in Crohn's disease.Dig Dis Sci. 2011; 56: 3610-3615
- Cognitive function in older women with breast cancer treated with standard chemotherapy and capecitabine on Cancer and Leukemia Group B 49907.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013; 139: 607-616
- Candesartan-Based therapy and risk of cancer in patients with systemic hypertension (Heart Institute of Japan Candesartan Randomized Trial for Evaluation in Coronary Artery Disease [HIJ-CREATE] substudy).Am J Cardiol. 2012; 109: 576-580
- Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes–an interim analysis.N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 28-38
- Does minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery result in less muscle injury than conventional surgery? A randomized controlled trial.Eur Spine J. 2011; 20: 51-57
- Frequency of inappropriate therapy in patients implanted with dual- versus single-chamber ICD devices in the ICD arm of MADIT-CRT.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013; 24: 672-679
- Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for the treatment of lumbar disk-related sciatica: cost utility analysis alongside a double-blind randomized controlled trial.Neurosurgery. 2011; 69: 829-836
- Cost effectiveness analysis of larval therapy for leg ulcers.BMJ. 2009; 338: b825
- Exploratory analysis of estimated acoustic peak rarefaction pressure, recanalization, and outcome in the transcranial ultrasound in clinical sonothrombolysis trial.J Clin Ultrasound. 2013; 41: 354-360
- Relationship between galectin-3 levels and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use in heart failure: analysis from HF-ACTION.J Card Fail. 2014; 20: 38-44
- Reporting characteristics of non-primary publications of results of randomized trials: a cross-sectional review.Trials. 2013; 14: 240
- Do pressures to publish increase scientists' bias? An empirical support from US States Data.PLoS One. 2010; 5: e10271
- “Positive” results increase down the Hierarchy of the Sciences.PLoS One. 2010; 5: e10068
- Treating individuals 4: can meta-analysis help target interventions at individuals most likely to benefit?.Lancet. 2005; 365: 341-346
- Treating individuals 2. Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation.Lancet. 2005; 365: 176-186
- Statistics in medicine–reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials.N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 2189-2194
- The challenge of subgroup analyses–reporting without distorting.N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 1667-1669
- Bias in associations of emerging biomarkers with cardiovascular disease.JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173: 664-671
- Almost all articles on cancer prognostic markers report statistically significant results.Eur J Cancer. 2007; 43: 2559-2579
- Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors.BMJ. 2005; 330: 753
- Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.CMAJ. 2004; 171: 735-740
- Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.JAMA. 2004; 291: 2457-2465
Women's Health Initiative, 2015. Available at https://http://www.whi.org/SitePages/WHIHome.aspx. Accessed January 2015.
- Linked publications from a single trial: a thread of evidence.Trials. 2014; 15: 369
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
Funding: There were no sponsors for this study. S.E. was supported by postdoctoral awards from MITACS Elevate and SickKids Restracomp, Z.N.S. by a doctoral award from the Canadian Diabetes Association and the Ontario Graduate Scholarship, and S.B. by a doctoral award from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. The Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS) is funded by a grant from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation. Sponsors providing individual financial support to authors did not have a role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the article; and decision to submit the article for publication.
Conflict of interest: None.