The comprehensive diagnostic study: a new solution to old problems?

Published:December 02, 2013DOI:
      Diagnostic labeling is one of the key elements of clinical care. The diagnostic label is used to explain symptoms, initiate appropriate treatment, or provide prognostic information [
      • Knottnerus J.A.
      • van Weel C.
      • Muris J.W.
      Evaluation of diagnostic procedures.
      ]. Choosing the correct diagnostic label based on the available diagnostic information can be challenging. Especially in primary care, which is the first contact setting for an unselected patient population, the clinician is left to choose from a large list of diagnostic possibilities. A patient presenting with chest pain may suffer from an acute coronary syndrome, hyperventilation, esophagitis, muscle pain, or pulmonary embolism [
      • Knockaert D.C.
      • Buntinx F.
      • Stoens N.
      • Bruyninckx R.
      • Delooz H.
      Chest pain in the emergency department: the broad spectrum of causes.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Knottnerus J.A.
        • van Weel C.
        • Muris J.W.
        Evaluation of diagnostic procedures.
        BMJ. 2002; 324: 477-480
        • Knockaert D.C.
        • Buntinx F.
        • Stoens N.
        • Bruyninckx R.
        • Delooz H.
        Chest pain in the emergency department: the broad spectrum of causes.
        Eur J Emerg Med. 2002; 9: 25-30
        • Sackett D.L.
        • Haynes R.B.
        The architecture of diagnostic research.
        BMJ. 2002; 324: 539-541
        • Rutjes A.W.
        • Reitsma J.B.
        • Di Nisio M.
        • Smidt N.
        • van Rijn J.C.
        • Bossuyt P.M.
        Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies.
        CMAJ. 2006; 174: 469-476
        • Bossuyt P.M.
        • Reitsma J.B.
        • Bruns D.E.
        • Gatsonis C.A.
        • Glasziou P.P.
        • Irwig L.M.
        • et al.
        Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD Initiative.
        Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138: 40-44
        • Buntinx F.
        • Truyen J.
        • Embrechts P.
        • Moreel G.
        • Peeters R.
        Evaluating patients with chest pain using classification and regression trees.
        Fam Pract. 1992; 9: 149-153
        • Mant A.
        • Bokey E.L.
        • Chapuis P.H.
        • Killingback M.
        • Hughes W.
        • Koorey S.G.
        • et al.
        Rectal bleeding. Do other symptoms aid in diagnosis?.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1989; 32: 191-196
        • Bruyninckx R.
        • Buntinx F.
        • Aertgeerts B.
        • Van Casteren V.
        The diagnostic value of macroscopic haematuria for the diagnosis of urological cancer in general practice.
        Br J Gen Pract. 2003; 53: 31-35
        • Hay A.D.
        • Gorst C.
        • Montgomery A.
        • Peters T.J.
        • Fahey T.
        Validation of a clinical rule to predict complications of acute cough in preschool children: a prospective study in primary care.
        Br J Gen Pract. 2007; 57: 530-537
        • Spiegelhalter D.J.
        Computer aided decision making in medicine.
        Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984; 289: 567-568
        • Smith D.
        Expert systems for medical diagnosis: a study in technology transfer.
        Technology Transfer Fall. 1992; : 45-53
        • Harper P.R.
        A review and comparison of classification algorithms for medical decision making.
        Health Policy. 2005; 71: 315-331
        • Biesheuvel C.J.
        • Vergouwe Y.
        • Steyerberg E.W.
        • Grobbee D.E.
        • Moons K.G.
        Polytomous logistic regression analysis could be applied more often in diagnostic research.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61: 125-134
        • Dobbin K.K.
        • Zhao Y.
        • Simon R.M.
        How large a training set is needed to develop a classifier for microarray data?.
        Clin Cancer Res. 2008; 14: 108-114
        • Fu W.J.
        • Dougherty E.R.
        • Mallick B.
        • Carroll R.J.
        How many samples are needed to build a classifier: a general sequential approach.
        Bioinformatics. 2005; 21: 63-70
        • Oostenbrink R.
        • Moons K.G.
        • Bleeker S.E.
        • Moll H.A.
        • Grobbee D.E.
        Diagnostic research on routine care data: prospects and problems.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2003; 56: 501-506
        • Black W.C.
        • Welch H.G.
        Advances in diagnostic imaging and overestimations of disease prevalence and the benefits of therapy.
        N Engl J Med. 1993; 328: 1237-1243
        • Welch H.G.
        • Schwartz L.S.
        • Woloshin S.
        Overdiagnosed. Making people sick in the pursuit of health.
        Beacon Press, Boston, MA2012
        • Harrell Jr., F.E.
        • Lee K.L.
        • Mark D.B.
        Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.
        Stat Med. 1996; 15: 361-387
        • Altman D.G.
        • Royston P.
        What do we mean by validating a prognostic model?.
        Stat Med. 2000; 19: 453-473
        • Royston P.
        • Altman D.G.
        External validation of a Cox prognostic model: principles and methods.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13: 33
        • Ripley B.D.
        Pattern recognition and neural networks.
        Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK1996

      Linked Article