Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 66, ISSUE 2, P197-201, February 2013

Sample size calculations for pilot randomized trials: a confidence interval approach

Published:November 29, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.002

      Abstract

      Objectives

      To describe a method using confidence intervals (CIs) to estimate the sample size for a pilot randomized trial.

      Study Design

      Using one-sided CIs and the estimated effect size that would be sought in a large trial, we calculated the sample size needed for pilot trials.

      Results

      Using an 80% one-sided CI, we estimated that a pilot trial should have at least 9% of the sample size of the main planned trial.

      Conclusion

      Using the estimated effect size difference for the main trial and using a one-sided CI, this allows us to calculate a sample size for a pilot trial, which will make its results more useful than at present.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Arain M.
        • Campbell M.J.
        • Cooper C.L.
        • Lancaster G.A.
        What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10: 678
        • Cox H.
        • Tilbrook H.
        • Aplin J.
        • Chuang L.H.
        • Hewitt C.
        • Jayakody S.
        • et al.
        A pragmatic multi-centred randomised controlled trial of yoga for chronic low back pain: trial protocol.
        Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2010; 16: 76-80
        • Tilbrook H.E.
        • Cox H.
        • Hewitt C.E.
        • Kang'ombe A.R.
        • Chuang L.H.
        • Jayakody S.
        • et al.
        Yoga for chronic low back pain. A randomized trial.
        Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155: 569-578
        • Thabane L.
        • Ma J.
        • Chu R.
        • Cheng J.
        • Ismaila A.
        • Rios L.P.
        • et al.
        A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10: 1
        • Julious S.A.
        Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study.
        Pharm Stat. 2005; 4: 287-291
        • Birkett M.A.
        • Day S.J.
        Internal pilot studies for estimating sample size.
        Stat Med. 1994; 13: 2455-2463
        • Browne R.H.
        On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination.
        Stat Med. 1995; 14: 1933-1940
        • Torgerson D.J.
        • Torgerson C.J.
        Designing randomised trials in health, education and the social sciences.
        Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK2008
        • Wittes J.
        • Brittain E.
        The role of internal pilot studies in increasing the efficiency of clinical trial.
        Stat Med. 1990; 9: 65-72
        • Bland J.M.
        The tyranny of power: is there a better way to calculate sample size?.
        BMJ. 2009; 339: b3985
        • Smithson M.
        Confidence intervals.
        Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA2003
        • Dupont W.D.
        • Plummer W.D.
        Power and sample size calculations: a review and computer program.
        Control Clin Trials. 1990; 11: 116-128
        • Sim J.
        • Lewis M.
        The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2012; 65: 301-308
        • Kjaergaard L.L.
        • Vilumsen J.
        • Cluud C.
        Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses.
        Ann Intern Med. 2001; 135: 982-989