Advertisement

Investigating incoherence gives insight: clopidogrel is equivalent to extended-release dipyridamole plus aspirin in secondary stroke prevention

      Abstract

      Objective

      To identify confounding factors that may explain the incoherence between direct and indirect evidence in a published analysis comparing extended-release dipyridamole (ERDP) plus aspirin to clopidogrel for the reduction of stroke.

      Study Design and Setting

      An existing analysis was updated with new studies from a systematic literature review. Clinicians reviewed the studies for potential confounders. Network meta-analyses were conducted including or excluding potential confounders, and were estimated based on direct, indirect, or a combination of direct and indirect evidence. Model fit was compared using the residual deviance and the deviance information criterion (DIC); node splitting was used to test for incoherence between the networks.

      Results

      Six trials and one meta-analysis were identified; aspirin dosage was identified as a potential confounder. The odds ratio (OR) for stroke of aspirin plus ERDP vs. clopidogrel based on indirect evidence without aspirin dosage adjustment is 0.85 (0.68–1.05); when accounting for the aspirin dose–response relationship it is 0.96 (0.73–1.25); and the direct evidence based on PRoFESS resulted in an OR of 1.02 (0.93–1.12).

      Conclusion

      When analyzing networks of evidence, attention should be paid to identifying and adjusting for potentially confounding factors. Investigating rather than ignoring inconsistency in the data set leads to clearer insight into relative efficacy.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Lu G.A.
        • Ades A.E.
        Assessing evidence inconsistency in mixed treatment comparisons.
        J Am Stat Assoc. 2006; 101: 447-459
        • Kent D.M.
        • Thaler D.E.
        Stroke prevention—insights from incoherence.
        N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 1287-1289
        • Glenny A.M.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Song F.
        • Sakarovitch C.
        • Deeks J.J.
        • D'Amico R.
        • et al.
        Indirect comparisons of competing interventions.
        Health Technol Assess. 2005; 9: 1-134
        • The ESPRIT Study Group
        Aspirin plus dipyridamole versus aspirin alone after cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin (ESPRIT): randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2006; 367 ([Erratum, Lancet 2007;369:274.]): 1665-1673
        • CAPRIE Steering Committee
        A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE).
        Lancet. 1996; 348: 1329-1339
        • Thijs V.
        • Lemmens R.
        • Fieuws S.
        Network meta-analysis: simultaneous meta-analysis of common antiplatelet regimens after transient ischaemic attack or stroke.
        Eur Heart J. 2008; 29: 1086-1092
        • Hankey G.K.
        • Eikelboom J.W.
        What do the results of the PRoFESS trial teach us?.
        Lancet. 2008; 7: 860-862
        • Verro P.
        • Gorelick P.B.
        • Nguyen D.
        Aspirin plus dipyridamole versus aspirin for the prevention of vascular events after stroke or TIA: a meta-analysis.
        Stroke. 2008; 39: 1358-1363
        • Diener H.C.
        • Sacco R.
        • Yusuf S.
        • Steering Committee
        • PRoFESS Study Group
        Rationale, design and baseline data of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial comparing two antithrombotic regimens (a fixed-dose combination of extended-release dipyridamole plus ASA with clopidogrel) and telmisartan versus placebo in patients with strokes: the Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes Trial (PRoFESS).
        Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007; 23: 368-380
        • Sacco R.L.
        • Diener H.C.
        • Yusuf S.
        • Cotton D.
        • Ounpuu S.
        • Lawton W.A.
        • et al.
        • PRoFESS Study Group
        Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke.
        N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 1238-1251
        • Diener H.C.
        • Bogousslavsky J.
        • Brass L.M.
        • Cimminiello C.
        • Csiba L.
        • Kaste M.
        • et al.
        • MATCH Investigators
        Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2004; 364: 331-337
        • Bhatt D.L.
        • Fox K.A.
        • Hacke W.
        • Berger P.B.
        • Black H.R.
        • Boden W.E.
        • et al.
        • CHARISMA Investigators
        Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events.
        N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 1706-1717
        • Bhatt D.L.
        • Flather M.D.
        • Hacke W.
        • Berger P.B.
        • Black H.R.
        • Boden W.E.
        • et al.
        • CHARISMA Investigators
        Patients with prior myocardial infarction, stroke or symptomatic peripheral artery disease in the CHARISMA trial.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49: 1982-1988
        • Diener H.C.
        • Cunha L.
        • Forbes C.
        • Sivenius J.
        • Smets P.
        • Lowenthal A.
        European Stroke Prevention Study. 2. Dipyridamole and acetylsalicylic acid in the secondary prevention of stroke.
        J Neurol Sci. 1996; 143: 1-13
        • Song F.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Glenny A.M.
        • Deeks J.J.
        Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses.
        BMJ. 2003; 326: 472-476
        • Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration
        Collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients.
        BMJ. 2002; 324: 71-86
        • Dias S.
        • Welton N.J.
        • Caldwell D.M.
        • Ades A.E.
        Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison analysis.
        Stat Med. 2010; 29: 932-944
        • Lu G.
        • Ades A.E.
        Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons.
        Stat Med. 2004; 23: 3105-3124