Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 61, ISSUE 3, P261-267.e16, March 2008

Download started.

Ok

Risk factor measurement quality in primary care routine data was variable but nondifferential between individuals

Published:November 23, 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.05.020

      Abstract

      Objective

      To retrospectively assess the quality of cardiovascular disease risk factor measurements in routinely collected data and to examine whether there are systematic differences in measurement quality between individuals of different socioeconomic status, and changes in measurement quality over time.

      Study Design and Setting

      Comparison of last digit preference in risk factor measurement between a “routine” data set (related to a primary care–based UK cardiovascular risk factor screening programme) and relevant prospective epidemiological surveys (Health Survey for England [HSE] and WHO MONICA). For the routine data set, the records of 37,161 women and 33,977 men aged 35–60 years with a first screening episode during the 11-year period 1989–1999 were analyzed.

      Results

      Last digits of height, weight, and total cholesterol measurements in the routine data set did not exhibit a digit preference pattern, although the degree of random measurement error was greater compared with epidemiological survey data. The last digits of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) measurements exhibited a strong last digit preference pattern for “0”—comprising 63.1% and 67.3% of all observations in men and women, respectively. Except for diastolic BP in men, last digit distribution patterns were not associated with participant's socioeconomic status and showed no change over time.

      Conclusion

      It may be feasible to study changes over time in cardiovascular disease risk factor levels in different socioeconomic groups using routine data sets; however, prior critical examination of measurement quality is necessary.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bundred P.
        • Kitchiner D.
        • Buchan I.
        Prevalence of overweight and obese children between 1989 and 1998: population based series of cross sectional studies.
        BMJ. 2001; 322: 326-328
        • Buchan I.E.
        • Bundred P.E.
        • Kitchiner D.J.
        • Cole T.J.
        Body mass index has risen more steeply in tall than in short 3-year olds: serial cross-sectional surveys 1988–2003.
        Int J Obes (Lond). 2007; 31: 23-29
        • Buchan I.
        Measuring all children to tackle obesity: why and how?.
        ERPHO. 2006; 18 (Eastern Region Public Health Observatory Available at) (quick link 14464. (Accessed July 2007)): 5
        • Strong M.
        • Maheswaran R.
        • Radford J.
        Socioeconomic deprivation, coronary heart disease prevalence and quality of care: a practice-level analysis in Rotherham using data from the new UK general practitioner Quality and Outcomes Framework.
        J Public Health (Oxf). 2006; 28: 39-42
        • Sigfrid L.A.
        • Turner C.
        • Crook D.
        • Ray S.
        Using the UK primary care quality and outcomes framework to audit health care equity: preliminary data on diabetes management.
        J Public Health (Oxf). 2006; 28: 221-225
        • Cross M.
        Will connecting for health deliver its promises?.
        BMJ. 2006; 332: 599-601
        • Bartys S.
        • Baker D.
        • Lewis P.
        • Middleton E.
        Inequity in recording of risk in a local population-based screening programme for cardiovascular disease.
        Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2005; 12: 63-67
        • Lyratzopoulos G.
        • McElduff P.
        • Heller R.F.
        • Hanily M.
        • Lewis P.S.
        Mid-term body mass index increase among obese and non-obese individuals in middle life and deprivation status: a cohort study.
        BMC Public Health. 2005; 5: 32
        • Lyratzopoulos G.
        • McElduff P.
        • Heller R.F.
        • Hanily M.
        • Lewis P.S.
        Comparative levels and time trends in blood pressure, total cholesterol, body mass index and smoking among Caucasian and South-Asian participants of a UK primary-care based cardiovascular risk factor screening programme.
        BMC Public Health. 2005; 5: 125
        • Lyratzopoulos G.
        • Heller R.F.
        • McElduff P.
        • Hanily M.
        • Lewis P.S.
        Deprivation and trends in blood pressure, cholesterol, body mass index and smoking among participants of a UK primary-care based cardiovascular risk factor screening programme: both narrowing and widening in cardiovascular risk factor inequalities.
        Heart. 2006; 92: 1198-1206
        • Working Party of the British Hypertension Society
        Recommendations on blood pressure measurements.
        BMJ, London1988
        • Allain C.C.
        • Poon L.S.
        • Chan C.S.
        • Richmond W.
        • Fu P.C.
        Enzymatic determination of total serum cholesterol.
        Clin Chem. 1974; 20: 470-475
        • Townsend P.
        • Phillimore P.
        • Beattie A.
        Health and deprivation: inequality and the north.
        Croom Helm, London1988
        • Pajunen P.
        • Koukkunen H.
        • Ketonen M.
        • Jerkkola T.
        • Immonen-Raiha P.
        • Karja-Koskenkari P.
        • et al.
        The validity of the Finnish hospital discharge register and causes of death register data on coronary heart disease.
        Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2005; 12: 132-137
        • Mahonen M.
        • Salomaa V.
        • Torppa J.
        • Miettinen H.
        • Pyorala K.
        • Immonen-Raiha P.
        • et al.
        The validity of the routine mortality statistics on coronary heart disease in Finland: comparison with the FINMONICA MI register data for the years 1983–1992. Finnish multinational monitoring of trends and determinants in Cardiovascular disease.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1999; 52: 157-166
        • Madsen M.
        • Davidsen M.
        • Rasmussen S.
        • Abildstrom S.Z.
        • Osler M.J.
        The validity of the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in routine statistics: a comparison of mortality and hospital discharge data with the Danish MONICA registry.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2003; 56: 124-130
        • Hense H.W.
        • Kuulasmaa K.
        • Zaborskis A.
        • Kupsc W.
        • Tuomilehto J.
        Quality assessment of blood pressure measurements in epidemiological surveys. The impact of last digit preference and the proportions of identical duplicate measurements.
        Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1990; 38: 463-468
        • Thavarajah S.
        • White W.B.
        • Mansoor G.A.
        Terminal digit bias in a specialty hypertension faculty practice.
        J Hum Hypertens. 2003; 17: 819-822
        • Graves J.W.
        • Bailey K.R.
        • Grossardt B.R.
        • Gullerud R.E.
        • Meverden R.A.
        • Grill D.E.
        • et al.
        The impact of observer and patient factors on the occurrence of digit preference for zero in blood pressure measurement in a hypertension specialty clinic: evidence for the need of continued observations.
        J Hum Hypertens. 2006; 19: 567-572
        • Wen S.W.
        • Kramer M.S.
        • Hoey J.
        • Hanley J.A.
        • Usher R.H.
        Terminal digit preference, random error and bias in routine clinical measurement of blood pressure.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1993; 46: 1187-1193
        • Hense H.W.
        • Stieber J.
        • Kuch B.
        • Keil U.
        Blood pressure measurements in epidemiological surveys—time to change?.
        Z Kardiol. 1996; 85: 66-70
        • Hense H.W.
        • Koivisto A.-M.
        • Kuulasmaa K.
        • Zaborskis A.
        • Kupsc W.
        • Tuomilehto J.
        Assessment of blood pressure measurement quality in the baseline surveys of the WHO MONICA Project.
        J Hum Hypertens. 1995; 9: 935-946
        • Molarius A.
        • Kuulasmaa K.
        • Sans S.
        Quality assessment of weight and height measurements in the WHO MONICA project.
        (Available at) (Accessed March 2007)