Response to Tu and Gilthorpe: Preventing misinterpretation of coefficients in analysis of fetal origins of adult disease

We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the letter of Dr. Tu and Dr. Gilthorpe [

Unexplained residuals modelling are not solutions to statistical modelling of the fetal origins hypothesis.

].

To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

One-time access price info

Already a print subscriber? Claim online access

Already an online subscriber? Sign in

References

- Tu Y.K.
- Gilthorpe M.S.
Unexplained residuals modelling are not solutions to statistical modelling of the fetal origins hypothesis.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006; 60: 318-319
View in Article
- Keijzer-Veen M.G.
- Euser A.M.
- van Montfoort A.G.
- Dekker F.W.
- Vandenbroucke J.P.
- van Houwelingen J.C.
A regression model with unexplained residuals was preferred in the analysis of the fetal origins of adult diseases hypothesis.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005; 58: 1320-1324
View in Article
- Lucas A.
- Fewtrell M.S.
- Cole T.J.
Fetal origins of adult disease—the hypothesis revisited.
BMJ. 1999; 319: 245-249
View in Article

Published online: October 25, 2006

Property	Value
Status
Version
Ad File
Disable Ads Flag
Environment
Moat Init
Moat Ready
Contextual Ready
Contextual URL
Contextual Initial Segments
Contextual Used Segments
AdUnit
SubAdUnit
Custom Targeting
Ad Events
Invalid Ad Sizes