Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 60, ISSUE 3, P280-287, March 2007

Randomized trial vs. observational study of acupuncture for migraine found that patient characteristics differed but outcomes were similar

      Abstract

      Objective

      To compare patient characteristics and outcomes between a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and an observational study (OS) of acupuncture treatment in patients with migraine.

      Study Design and Setting

      Within the framework of a research program for acupuncture for chronic pain, both an RCT and an OS of routine care were performed in patients with migraine. One hundred forty-five patients received acupuncture in the RCT and 732 in the OS. All patients completed a pain questionnaire, including instruments evaluating disability, quality of life, and depression, at baseline and at 6-month follow-up.

      Results

      At baseline, patients participating in the RCT had a significantly longer history of complaints and more headache days but better quality of life and fewer depressive symptoms than patients participating in the OS. In unadjusted analyses, improvements after 6 months were more pronounced in the OS than in the RCT. After adjustment for potential confounders, the differences decreased but were still significant for several outcomes.

      Conclusion

      Participants of the RCT were probably not representative of migraine patients undergoing acupuncture treatment in routine care under current regulations in Germany. However, changes after treatment were similar in the RCT and the OS of routine care.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Melchart D.
        • Linde K.
        • Fischer P.
        • White A.
        • Allais G.
        • Vickers A.
        • et al.
        Acupuncture for recurrent headaches: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
        Cephalalgia. 1999; 19: 779-786
        • Melchart D.
        • Streng A.
        • Hoppe A.
        • Jürgens S.
        • Weidenhammer W.
        • Linde K.
        Akupunktur bei chronischen Schmerzen. Ergebnisse aus dem Modellvorhaben der Ersatzkassen.
        Dtsch Ärztebl. 2006; 103: A187-A195
        • Diener H.C.
        • Krämer J.
        • Wippermann F.
        • Molsberger A.
        • Schäfer H.
        • Victor N.
        • et al.
        Die gerac Akupunktur Studien—German acupuncture trials.
        Z Ärztl Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2004; 98: 468-471
        • Witt C.
        • Brinkhaus B.
        • Jena S.
        • Selim D.
        • Löbel S.
        • Willich S.N.
        Modellvorhaben Akupunktur der Techniker Krankenkasse und der dem Modellvorhaben beigetretenen Krankenkassen.
        Z Ärztl Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2004; 98: 473-475
        • International Headache Society Clinical Trials Subcommittee
        Guideline for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: second edition.
        Cephalalgia. 2000; 20: 765-786
        • Linde K.
        • Streng A.
        • Jürgens S.
        • Hoppe A.
        • Brinkhaus B.
        • Witt C.
        • et al.
        Acupuncture for patients with migraine. A randomized controlled trial.
        JAMA. 2005; 293: 2118-2125
        • Melchart D.
        • Weidenhammer W.
        • Streng A.
        • Hoppe A.
        • Pfaffenrath V.
        • Linde K.
        Acupuncture for chronic headaches—an epidemiological study.
        Headache. 2006; 46: 632-641
        • International Headache Society
        ICH-10 guide for headaches.
        Cephalalgia. 1997; 17: 1-82
        • Diener H.C.
        • Brune K.
        • Gerber W.D.
        • Göbel H.
        • Pfaffenrath V.
        Behandlung der Migräneattacke und Migräneprophylaxe.
        Dtsch Ärztebl. 1997; 94: C-2277-C-2283
        • Nagel B.
        • Gerbershagen H.U.
        • Lindena G.
        • Pfingsten M.
        Entwicklung und empirische Überprüfung des Deutschen Schmerzfragebogens der DGSS.
        Schmerz. 2002; 16: 263-270
        • Dillmann U.
        • Nilges P.
        • Saile E.
        • Gerbershagen H.U.
        Behinderungseinschätzung bei chronischen Schmerzpatienten.
        Schmerz. 1994; 8: 100-110
        • Geissner E.
        • Schulte A.
        Die Schmerzempfindungsskala (SES).
        Beltz, Weinheim1991
        • Hautzinger M.
        • Bailer M.
        Allgemeine Depressionsskala (ADS). Die deutsche Version des CES-D.
        Beltz, Weinheim1991
        • Bullinger M.
        • Kirchberger I.
        SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand.
        Hogrefe, Göttingen1998
        • Marstedt G.
        • Moebus S.
        Inanspruchnahme alternativer Methoden in der Medizin.
        in: Robert-Koch-Institut Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes, Heft 9. Verlag Robert-Koch-Institut, Berlin2002: 7
        • Weidenhammer W.
        • Streng A.
        • Jürgens S.
        • Hoppe A.
        • Linde K.
        • Melchart D.
        Aufbau, Realisierung und Datenübersicht einer Beobachtungsstudie im Rahmen des Programms zur Evaluation der Patientenversorgung mit Akupunktur (PEP-AK) des Modellvorhabens der Ersatzkassen.
        Gesundheitswesen. 2005; 67: 264-273
        • Van der Kuy P.H.M.
        • Lohmann J.J.H.M.
        A quantification of the placebo response in migraine prophylaxis.
        Cephalalgia. 2002; 22: 209-221
        • Linde K.
        • Rossnagel K.
        Propranolol for migraine prophylaxis.
        The Cochrane Library. 2004; ([Cochrane Review])
        • Kaptchuk T.J.
        • Goldman P.
        • Stone D.A.
        • Stason W.B.
        Do medical devices have enhanced placebo effects?.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2000; 53: 786-792
      1. Gray RN, Goslin RE, McCrory DC, Eberlein K, Tulsky J, Hasselblad V. Drug treatments for theprevention of migraine headache. Technical review 2.3. Durham, NC, Duke University, Center for Clinical Health Policy and Research, for the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, MD: 1999.

        • Allais G.
        • De Lorenzo C.
        • Quirico P.
        • Airola G.
        • Tolardo G.
        • Mana O.
        • et al.
        Acupuncture in the prophylactic treatment of migraine without aura: a comparison with flunarizine.
        Headache. 2002; 42: 855-861
        • Hesse J.
        • Mogelvang B.
        • Simonsen H.
        Acupuncture versus metoprolol in migraine prophylaxis: a randomized trial of trigger point inactivation.
        J Intern Med. 1994; 235: 451-456
        • Diener H.C.
        • Kronfeld K.
        • Boewing G.
        • Lungenhausen M.
        • Maier C.
        • Molsberger A.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of acupuncture for the prophylaxis of migraine: a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial.
        Lancet Neurol. 2006; 5: 310-316
        • Linde K.
        • Scholz M.
        • Melchart D.
        • Willich S.N.
        Should systematic reviews include non-randomized and uncontrolled studies? The case of acupuncture for chronic headache.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2002; 55: 77-85