Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 60, ISSUE 3, P288-293, March 2007

Triggered sampling could help improve longitudinal studies of persons with elevated mortality risk

  • Joel A. Dubin
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Tel.: 519-885-1211 ext. 7318.
    Affiliations
    Department of Statistics & Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada

    Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ling Han
    Affiliations
    Department of Internal Medicine, Program on Aging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Terri R. Fried
    Affiliations
    Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA

    VA Connecticut Healthcare System, Clinical Epidemiology Research Center 151B, West Haven, CT, USA
    Search for articles by this author
Published:September 29, 2006DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.012

      Abstract

      Objective

      One approach to overcoming potential biased results, due to dropout from longitudinal clinical studies, is to capture additional data once a marker of health downturn is observed but before the patient leaves the study. We denote this study design feature as “triggered sampling” (TS).

      Study Design and Setting

      We formally define TS, describe some mechanisms for incorporating TS in longitudinal studies, and present the results from a 2-year longitudinal observational study of treatment preferences, measured on a 1–7 scale, of patients with advanced illness from cancer, congestive heart failure, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We examined the utility of TS through multiple analyses, including mixed effects models.

      Results

      One hundred forty-eight of 226 participants experienced at least one triggered interview. Those who did not drop out after their first trigger had no noticeable change in their mean preferences (6.20 pretrigger, 6.16 trigger, P=0.76), whereas those who dropped out after their first trigger did (6.29 pretrigger, 5.69 trigger, P=0.04). The mixed effects models conveyed similar results, providing support for the efficiency and efficacy of TS.

      Conclusion

      TS can help alleviate bias due to impending dropout and potentially be a valuable addition to the designs of longitudinal studies of persons with elevated mortality risk.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Chatfield M.D.
        • Brayne C.E.
        • Matthews F.E.
        A systematic literature review of attrition between waves in longitudinal studies in the elderly shows a consistent pattern of dropout between differing studies.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2005; 58: 13-19
        • Rabbitt P.
        • Diggle P.
        • Holland F.
        • McInnes L.
        Practice and drop-out effects during a 17-year longitudinal study of cognitive aging.
        J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2004; 59: 84-97
        • Rabbitt P.
        • Lunn M.
        • Wong D.
        Neglect of dropout underestimates effects of death in longitudinal studies.
        J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005; 60: 106-109
        • National Institutes of Health
        State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Improving End-of-Life Care.
        U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD2004
        • Fried T.R.
        • Bradley E.H.
        • Towle V.R.
        Patient preferences: integrating treatments and outcomes.
        J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002; 57: S348-S354
        • Little R.J.A.
        • Rubin D.B.
        Statistical analysis with missing data.
        2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken2002
        • Rubin D.B.
        Inference and missing data.
        Biometrika. 1976; 63: 581-592
        • Hall C.B.
        • Ying J.
        • Kuo L.
        • Lipton R.B.
        Bayesian and profile likelihood change point methods for modeling cognitive function over time.
        Comput Stat Data Anal. 2003; 42: 91-109