Advertisement

Age at diagnosis and the choice of survival analysis methods in cancer epidemiology

      Abstract

      A young age at diagnosis of cancer is often seen as an indicator of the aggressiveness of the tumor. However, empirical studies have shown conflicting results on the association between age at diagnosis and survival. There are two choices of time scale for a Cox regression model: time since diagnosis, and age. The regression analysis of relative survival rates is an alternative to the Cox model. Using breast cancer data from a population-based cancer registry, we illustrate the features of Cox models using the two time scales and compare them with the relative survival approach. Using a Cox model with time since diagnosis as the time scale, a younger age at diagnosis is associated with a lower mortality; using age as the time scale gives the opposite result. The relative survival approach agrees with the Cox model with age as the time scale. We maintain that a careful clarification of research purpose and a careful choice of methods are necessary.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Clark G.M.
        Prognostic and predictive factors.
        in: Harris J.R. Lippman M.E. Morrow M. Osborne C.K. Diseases of the breast. 2nd ed. Wolters Kluwer;, Philadelphia2000: 489-514
        • Holli K.
        • Isola J.
        Effect of age on the survival of breast cancer patients.
        Eur J Cancer. 1997; 33: 425-428
        • Albain K.S.
        • Allred D.C.
        • Clark G.M.
        Breast cancer outcome and predictors of outcome.
        J Natl Cancer Inst Mongr. 1994; 16: 35-42
        • Nixon A.J.
        • Neuberg D.
        • Hayes D.F.
        • Gelman R.
        • Connolly J.L.
        • Schnitt S.
        • Abner A.
        • Recht A.
        • Vicini F.
        • Harris J.R.
        Relationship of patient age to pathologic features of the tumor and prognosis for patients with stage I or II breast cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 1994; 12: 888-894
        • Joslyn S.A.
        • West M.M.
        Racial differences in breast carcinoma survival.
        Cancer. 2000; 88: 114-123
        • Cox D.R.
        Regression models and life tables (with discussion).
        J R Stat Soc B. 1972; 34: 187-220
        • Allison P.D.
        Survival analysis using the SAS system. SAS Institute Inc.;, Cary, NC1995
        • Korn E.L.
        • Graubard B.I.
        • Midthune D.
        Time-to-event analysis of longitudinal follow-up of a survey.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1997; 145: 72-80
        • Hakulinen T.
        • Tenkanen L.
        Regression analysis of relative survival rates.
        Appl Stat. 1987; 36: 309-317
        • Voutilainen E.T.
        • Dickman P.W.
        • Hakulinen T.
        SURV2. Finnish Cancer Registry;, Helsinki2000
        • National Center for Health Statistics
        U.S. decennial life tables for 1989–1991, vol 1 no 1. National Center for Health Statistics;, Hyattsville, MD1997
      1. National Cancer Institute. SEER cancer incidence public-use database, 1973–1997. National Cancer Institute CD-ROM # 2, ASCII version.

      2. Ries L.A. Kosary C.L. Hankey B.F. Harras A. Miller B.A. Edwards B.K. SEER cancer statistics. review, 1973–1994. National Cancer Institute;, Bethesda, MD1997
        • Clayton D.
        • Hills M.
        Statistical models in epidemiology. Oxford University Press;, Oxford1993
        • Newschaffer C.J.
        • Penberthy L.
        • Desch C.E.
        • Retchin S.M.
        • Whittemore M.
        The effect of age and comorbidity in the treatment of elderly women with nonmetastatic breast cancer.
        Arch Intern Med. 1996; 156: 85-90
      3. StataCorp. Stata reference manual. Release 6. College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2001.

        • Tilley J.
        Political generation and partisanship in the UK, 1964–1997.
        J R Stat Soc Series A. 2002; 165: 121-135
        • Thatcher A.R.
        The long-term pattern of adult mortality and the highest attained age.
        J R Stat Soc Series A. 1999; 162: 5-43