Knowledge translation is the use of knowledge in health care decision making

Published:November 18, 2009DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.016

      Abstract

      Objective

      To provide an overview of the science and practice of knowledge translation.

      Study Design

      Narrative review outlining what knowledge translation is and a framework for its use.

      Results

      Knowledge translation is defined as the use of knowledge in practice and decision making by the public, patients, health care professionals, managers, and policy makers. Failures to use research evidence to inform decision making are apparent across all these key decision maker groups. There are several proposed theories and frameworks for achieving knowledge translation. A conceptual framework developed by Graham et al., termed the knowledge-to-action cycle, provides an approach that builds on the commonalities found in an assessment of planned action theories.

      Conclusions

      Review of the evidence base for the science and practice of knowledge translation has identified several gaps including the need to develop valid strategies for assessing the determinants of knowledge use and for evaluating sustainability of knowledge translation interventions.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

      1. Kohn L.T. Corrigan J.M. Donaldson M.S. To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academy Press, Washington, DC1999
        • Davis D.
        • Evans M.
        • Jadad A.
        • Perrier L.
        • Rath D.
        • Ryan D.
        • et al.
        The case for KT: shortening the journey from evidence to effect.
        BMJ. 2003; 327: 33-35
        • Madon T.
        • Hofman K.J.
        • Kupfer L.
        • Glass R.I.
        Public health. Implementation science.
        Science. 2007; 318: 1728-1729
        • McGlynn E.A.
        • Asch S.M.
        • Adams J.
        • Keesey J.
        • Hicks J.
        • DeCristofaro A.
        • et al.
        The quality of health care delivered to adults in the US.
        N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 2635-2645
        • Graham I.D.
        • Logan J.
        • Harrison M.B.
        • Straus S.E.
        • Tetroe J.
        • Caswell W.
        • et al.
        Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map?.
        J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006; 26: 13-24
      2. McKibbon KA, Lokker C, Wilczynski NL, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Davis DA, et al. A descriptive study of the magnitude of the “Tower of Babel” problem for knowledge/information/research dissemination/diffusion/management/synthesis/exchange/implementation/mobilization/transfer/translation/transformation/uptake/utilization. Implementation Science (in press).

      3. (Available at) (Accessed February 2009)
        • Majumdar S.R.
        • McAlister F.A.
        • Furberg C.D.
        From knowledge to practice in chronic cardiovascular disease: a long and winding road.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 1738-1742
        • LaRosa J.C.
        • He J.
        • Vupputuri S.
        Effect of statins on the risk of coronary disease: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
        JAMA. 1999; 282: 2340-2346
        • Arnold S.R.
        • Straus S.E.
        Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in ambulatory care.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; (CD003539)
        • Kiesler D.J.
        • Auerbach S.M.
        Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 61: 319-341
        • Lavis J.N.
        • Ross S.E.
        • Hurley J.E.
        • Hohenadel J.M.
        • Stoddart G.L.
        • Woodward C.A.
        • et al.
        Examining the role of health services research in public policy making.
        Milbank Q. 2002; 80: 125-154
        • Oxman A.
        • Lavis J.N.
        • Fretheim A.
        Use of evidence in WHO recommendations.
        Lancet. 2007; 369: 1883-1889
        • Cabana M.D.
        • Rand C.S.
        • Powe N.R.
        • Wu A.W.
        • Wilson M.H.
        • Abboud P.A.
        • et al.
        Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.
        JAMA. 1999; 282: 1458-1465
        • Legare F.
        • Ratte S.
        • Gravel K.
        • Graham I.D.
        Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 73: 526-535
        • Legare F.
        • O'Connor A.M.
        • Graham I.D.
        • Saucier D.
        • Cote L.
        • Blais J.
        • et al.
        Primary health care professionals' views on barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the Ottawa decision support framework in practice.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 63: 380-390
        • Milner M.
        • Estabrooks C.A.
        • Myrick F.
        Research utilisation and clinical nurse educators: a systematic review.
        J Eval Clin Pract. 2006; 12: 639-655
        • Grimshaw J.M.
        • Eccles M.P.
        • Walker A.E.
        • Thomas R.E.
        Changing physician's behaviour: what works and thoughts on getting more things to work.
        J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002; 22: 237-243
      4. Graham ID, Harrison MB, Logan J and the KT Theories Research Group. A review of planned change (knowledge translation) models, frameworks and theories. Paper presented at: The JBI International Convention; November 2005; Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

        • Graham I.D.
        • Tetroe J.
        • KT Theories Research Group
        Some theoretical underpinnings of knowledge translation.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2007; 14: 936-941
        • Estabrooks C.A.
        • Thompson D.S.
        • Lovely J.J.
        • Hofmeyer A.
        A guide to knowledge translation theory.
        J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006; 26: 25-36
        • McDonald K.M.
        • Graham I.D.
        • Grimshaw J.
        Chapter 3. Toward a theoretic basis for quality improvement interventions.
        (Volume 1—Series Overview and Methodology. Technical Review 9 2004 (Contract No. 290-02-0017 to the Stanford University-UCSF Evidence-based Practices Center). AHRQ Publication No. 04-0051-1)in: Shojania K.G. McDonald K.M. Wachter R.M. Owens D.K. Closing the quality gap: a critical analysis of quality improvement strategies. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD2004
        • Wensing M.
        • Bosch M.
        • Foy R.
        • van der Weijden T.
        • Eccles M.
        • Grol R.
        Factors in theories on behaviour change to guide implementation and quality improvement in healthcare.
        Centres for Quality of Care Research (WOK), Nijmegen, The Netherlands2005
        • Ciaschini P.
        • Straus S.E.
        • Dolovich L.
        • Goeree R.
        • Leung K.
        • Woods C.
        • et al.
        Community based randomised trial of an osteoporosis and falls assessment intervention.
        Trials. 2008; 9: 62
        • Wells G.A.
        • Cranney A.
        • Peterson J.
        • Boucher M.
        • Shea B.
        • Welch V.
        • et al.
        Alendronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;
        • Gates S.
        • Fisher J.D.
        • Cooke M.E.
        • Carter Y.H.
        • Lamb S.E.
        Multifactorial assessment and targeted intervention for preventing falls and injuries among older people in community and emergency settings: systematic review and meta-analysis.
        BMJ. 2008; 336: 130-133