Advertisement

A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence:

The Norwegian EPINCONT Study

      Abstract

      Objectives: The aim was to assess the prevalence of any urinary leakage in an unselected female population in Norway, and to estimate the prevalence of significant incontinence. Methods: The EPINCONT Study is part of a large survey (HUNT 2) performed in a county in Norway during 1995–97. Everyone aged 20 years or more was invited. 27,936 (80%) of 34,755 community-dwelling women answered a questionnaire. A validated severity index was used to assess severity. Results: Twenty-five percent of the participating women had urinary leakage. Nearly 7% had significant incontinence, defined as moderate or severe incontinence that was experienced as bothersome. The prevalence of incontinence increased with increasing age. Half of the incontinence was of stress type, 11% had urge and 36% mixed incontinence. Conclusions: Urinary leakage is highly prevalent. Seven percent have significant incontinence and should be regarded as potential patients.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • AHCPR Urinary Incontinence in Adults Guideline Update Panel
        Managing acute and chronic urinary incontinence.
        Am Fam Physician. 1996; 54: 1661-1672
        • Hunskaar S
        • Arnold E.P
        • Burgio K
        • Diokno A.C
        • Herzog A.R
        • Mallett V.T
        Epidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence (UI).
        in: Abrams P Khoury S Wein A Incontinence. Health Publication Ltd, Monaco1999: 197-226
        • Hampel C
        • Wienhold D
        • Benken N
        • Eggersmann C
        • Thuroff J.W
        Prevalence and natural history of female incontinence.
        Eur Urol. 1997; 2: 3-12
        • Thom D
        Variation in estimates of urinary incontinence prevalence in the community.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998; 46: 473-480
        • Sandvik H
        • Hunskaar S
        • Seim A
        • Hermstad R
        • Vanvik A
        • Bratt H
        Validation of a severity index in female urinary incontinence and its implementation in an epidemiological survey.
        J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993; 47: 497-499
        • Sandvik H
        • Seim A
        • Vanvik A
        • Hunskaar S
        A severity index for epidemiological surveys of female urinary incontinence. Comparison with 48-hour pad weighing tests.
        Neurourol Urodyn. 2000; 19: 137-145
        • Holmen J
        • Midthjell K
        • Forsen L
        • Skjerve K
        • Gorseth M
        • Oseland A
        A health survey in Nord-Trondelag 1984–86. Participation and comparison of attendants and non-attendants. (In Norwegian, abstract in English).
        Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1990; 110: 1973-1977
        • Abrams P
        • Blaivas J.G
        • Stanton S.L
        • Andersen J.T
        The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. The International Continence Society Committee on Standardisation of Terminology.
        Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1988; suppl. 114): 5-19
        • Holtedahl K
        • Hunskaar S
        Prevalence, 1-year incidence and factors associated with urinary incontinence.
        Maturitas. 1998; 28: 205-211
        • Foldspang A
        • Mommsen S
        The International Continence Society (ICS) incontinence definition.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1997; 50: 1055-1060
        • Jolleys J.V
        Reported prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in a general practice.
        Br Med J. 1988; 296: 1300-1302
        • Harrison G.L
        • Memel D.S
        Urinary incontinence in women.
        Br J Gen Pract. 1994; 44: 149-152
        • Rekers H
        • Drogendijk A.C
        • Valkenburg H.A
        • Riphagen F
        The menopause, urinary incontinence and other symptoms of the genito-urinary tract.
        Maturitas. 1992; 15: 101-111
        • Elving L.B
        • Foldspang A
        • Lam G.W
        • Mommsen S
        Descriptive epidemiology of urinary incontinence in 3,100 women age 30–59.
        Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1989; suppl. 125): 37-43
        • Fall M
        • Frankenberg S
        • Frisén M
        • Larsson B
        • Petrén M
        456000 Swedes may have urinary incontinence. Only one in four seek help for their symptoms. (In Swedish).
        Läkartidningen. 1985; 82: 2054-2056
        • Feneley R.C.L
        • Shepherd A.M
        • Powell P.H
        • Blannin J
        Urinary incontinence.
        Br J Urol. 1979; 51: 493-496
        • Thomas T.M
        • Plymat K.R
        • Blannin J
        • Meade T.W
        Prevalence of urinary incontinence.
        Br Med J. 1980; 281: 1243-1245
        • Yarnell J.W.G
        • Voyle G.J
        • Richards C.J
        • Stephenson T.P
        The prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence in women.
        J Epidemiol Community Health. 1981; 35: 71-74
        • Milsom I
        • Ekelund P
        • Molander U
        • Arvidsson L
        • Areskoug B
        The influence of age, parity, oral contraception, hysterectomy and menopause on the prevalence of urinary incontinence in women.
        J Urol. 1993; 149: 1459-1462
        • Rekers H
        • Drogendijk A.C
        • Valkenburg H
        • Riphagen F
        Urinary incontinence in women from 35 to 79 years of age.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1992; 43: 229-234
        • Brocklehurst J.C
        Urinary incontinence in the community—analysis of a MORI poll.
        Br Med J. 1993; 306: 832-834
        • Lara C
        • Nacey J
        Ethnic differences between Maori, Pacific Island and European New Zealand women in prevalence and attitudes to urinary incontinence.
        N Z Med J. 1994; 107: 374-376
        • Sandvik H
        • Hunskaar S
        Incontinence in women.
        J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994; 48: 419-422
        • Sommer P
        • Bauer T
        • Nielsen K.K
        • Kristensen E.S
        • Hermann G.G
        • Steven K
        • Nordling J.M
        Voiding patterns and prevalence of incontinence in women. A questionnaire survey.
        Br J Urol. 1990; 66: 12-15
        • Diokno A.C
        • Brown M.B
        • Brock B.M
        • Herzog A.R
        • Normolle D.P
        Clinical and cystometric characteristics of continent and incontinent noninstitutionalized elderly.
        J Urol. 1988; 140: 567-571
        • Holst K
        • Wilson P.D
        The prevalence of female urinary incontinence and reasons for not seeking treatment.
        N Z Med J. 1988; 101: 756-758
        • Lagro-Janssen T.L.M
        • Smits A.J
        • van Weel C
        Women with urinary incontinence.
        Br J Gen Pract. 1990; 40: 331-334
        • Vetter N.J
        • Jones D.A
        • Victor C.R
        Urinary incontinence in the elderly at home.
        Lancet. 1981; ii: 1275-1277
        • Burgio K.L
        • Matthews K.A
        • Engel B.T
        Prevalence, incidence and correlates of urinary incontinence in healthy, middle-aged women.
        J Urol. 1991; 146: 1255-1259
        • Sandvik H
        • Hunskaar S
        • Vanvik A
        • Bratt H
        • Seim A
        • Hermstad R
        Diagnostic classification of female urinary incontinence.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1995; 48: 339-343
        • Hunskaar S
        • Vinsnes A
        The quality of life in women with urinary incontinence as measured by the sickness impact profile.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991; 39: 378-382