| |
Article Title |
Author(s) |
Type (Status) |
Available Online |
|
Industry influenced evidence production in collaborative research communities: A network analysis
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.10.010
Abstract: Objective: To measure the relative influence that industry authors have on collaborative research communities and evidence production. Study Design and Setting: Using 22 commonly prescribed ...
|
Adam G. Dunn,
Blanca Gallego,
Enrico Coiera
|
Full-length article
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
03 February 2012 |
|
Clinical practice guidelines and patient decision aids. An inevitable relationship
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.10.007
Abstract: As health professionals and patients are moving toward shared models of decision making, there is a growing need for integrated decision support tools that facilitate uptake of best evidence...
|
Trudy van der Weijden,
Antoine Boivin,
Jako Burgers,
Holger J. Schünemann,
Glyn Elwyn
et al.
|
Discussion
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
02 February 2012 |
|
Response to Letter to the Editor on administrative database research infrequently uses validated diagnostic or procedural codes
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.12.002
Callahan clarifies an important issue surrounding validation studies restricted to the review of cases having a particular coding algorithm to determine whether the condition represented by the codes ...
|
Carl van Walraven
|
Correspondence
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
30 January 2012 |
|
Trial registration in Latin America and the Caribbean’s: study of randomized trials published in 2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.09.003
Abstract: Objective: To determine the prevalence of trial registration in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in 2010 (PUBMED/LILACS) from Latin America and the Caribbean’s (LAC) and to comp...
|
Ludovic Reveiz,
Xavier Bonfill,
Demian Glujovsky,
Carlos E. Pinzon,
Claudia Asenjo-Lobos,
Marcela Cortes,
Martin Canon,
Ariel Bardach,
Daniel Comandé,
Andrés F. Cardona
et al.
|
Full-length article
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
30 January 2012 |
|
Endocrine clinical practice guidelines in North America. A systematic assessment of quality
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.014
Abstract: Objective: To assess the quality of endocrine guidelines developed in North America. Study Design and Setting: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify all endocrine c...
|
Irina Bancos,
Theresa Cheng,
Larry J. Prokop,
Victor M. Montori,
Mohammad Hassan Murad
et al.
|
Full-length article
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
27 January 2012 |
|
Regarding adequate methods for comparison of effect measures
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.10.005
We are pleased to observe that we agree with Prof Dr Bender that baseline risk should be considered when effect measurers are reported . When it comes to his critique, we are clearly aware that one ca...
|
Torbjørn Wisløff,
Odd O. Aalen,
Ivar S. Kristiansen
|
Correspondence
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
24 January 2012 |
|
Adequate methods should be used to compare the features of effect measures
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.013
In a recent article on the considerable variation of the number needed to treat (NNT), Wisløff et al. used Monte Carlo simulations to compare the distribution of NNT with that of the relative risk (R...
|
Ralf Bender
|
Correspondence
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
24 January 2012 |
|
Gradually implemented new biomarkers for prognostication of breast cancer: complete case analysis may introduce bias
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.09.013
Abstract: Objective: Many recent studies investigated the prognostic value of new biomarkers in breast cancer using data from cancer registries. Some of these studies were conducted using only patient...
|
Nirmala Bhoo Pathy,
Cuno S.P.M. Uiterwaal,
Nur Aishah Taib,
Helena M. Verkooijen,
Cheng Har Yip
et al.
|
Full-length article
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
24 January 2012 |
|
US general population norms for telephone administration of the SF-36v2
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.09.008
Abstract: Objective: US general population norms for mail administration of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) were established in 1998. This article reports SF-36v2 tel...
|
Gregory A. Maglinte,
Ron D. Hays,
Robert M. Kaplan
|
Full-length article
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
24 January 2012 |
|
Trends in death rate from diabetes according to multiple-cause-of-death differed from that according to underlying-cause-of-death in Taiwan but not in the United States, 1987–2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.09.010
Abstract: Objective: To examine whether trends in death rate from diabetes according to multiple-cause-of-death (MCOD) data differed from those according to underlying-cause-of-death (UCOD) data in Ta...
|
Yu-Pei Lin,
Tsung-Hsueh Lu
|
Full-length article
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
24 January 2012 |
|
Robust meta-analytic conclusions mandate the provision of prediction intervals in meta-analysis summaries
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.09.012
Abstract: Objectives: Results of meta-analyses typically conclude that future large studies may be mandated. However, the predictive ability of these estimates is deficient. We explored meta-analytic ...
|
Petra L. Graham,
John L. Moran
|
Full-length article
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
24 January 2012 |
|
Good interobserver agreement was attainable on outcome adjudication in patients with stable coronary heart disease
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.09.011
Abstract: Objective: In clinical trials, agreement on outcomes is of utmost importance for valid estimation of intervention effects. As there is limited knowledge about adjudicator agreement in cardio...
|
Erik Kjoller,
Jorgen Hilden,
Per Winkel,
Niels J. Frandsen,
Soren Galatius,
Gorm Jensen,
Jens Kastrup,
Jorgen Fischer Hansen,
Hans J. Kolmos,
Christian M. Jespersen,
Per Hildebrandt,
Christian Gluud,
the CLARICOR Trial Group
et al.
|
Full-length article
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
19 January 2012 |
|
Health awareness and associations with nonparticipation bias—a question of faith in life?
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.10.003
I would like to thank Ivy Shiue for her thoughtful and constructive comments on our article “Register-based data indicated nonparticipation bias in a health study among aging people” published in the...
|
Olli Nummela
|
Correspondence
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
04 January 2012 |
|
Increasing health awareness to decreasing nonparticipation bias in health studies
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.10.004
It is with great interest to read “Register-based data indicated nonparticipation bias in a health study among aging people” by Nummela et al. , which addressed the differences in response rates acros...
|
Ivy Shiue
|
Correspondence
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
04 January 2012 |
|
Two-thirds of methodological research remained unpublished after presentation at Cochrane Colloquia: an empirical analysis
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.09.009
Abstract: Objectives: To determine the extent to which abstracts of methodology research, initially presented at annual meetings of The Cochrane Collaboration, have been published as full reports and ...
|
Sarah Chapman,
Anne Eisinga,
Sally Hopewell,
Mike Clarke
|
Full-length article
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
04 January 2012 |
|
Lethal misconceptions: interpretation and bias in studies of traffic deaths
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.09.007
Abstract: Clinical epidemiology studies are vulnerable to subtle confounding, leading skeptics to claim that an odds ratio below three rarely indicates a clinically important finding. We argue that su...
|
Donald A. Redelmeier,
Christopher J. Yarnell
|
Discussion
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
04 January 2012 |
|
Development and validation of clinical prediction models: Marginal differences between logistic regression, penalized maximum likelihood estimation, and genetic programming
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.08.011
Abstract: Objective: Many prediction models are developed by multivariable logistic regression. However, there are several alternative methods to develop prediction models. We compared the accuracy of...
|
Kristel J.M. Janssen,
Ivar Siccama,
Yvonne Vergouwe,
Erik Koffijberg,
T.P.A. Debray,
Maarten Keijzer,
Diederick E. Grobbee,
Karel G.M. Moons
et al.
|
Full-length article
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
04 January 2012 |
|
Within-person study designs had lower precision and greater susceptibility to bias because of trends in exposure than cohort and nested case–control designs
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.09.004
Abstract: Objective: To compare precision and apparent bias between cohort, nested case–control, self-controlled case series, case–crossover, and case–time–control study designs. Study Design and Sett...
|
Jennifer M. Nicholas,
Andrew P. Grieve,
Martin C. Gulliford
|
Full-length article
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
26 December 2011 |
|
Multicriteria benefit–risk assessment using network meta-analysis
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.09.005
Abstract: Objective: To enable multicriteria benefit–risk (BR) assessment of any number of alternative treatments using all available evidence from a network of clinical trials. Study Design and Setti...
|
Gert van Valkenhoef,
Tommi Tervonen,
Jing Zhao,
Bert de Brock,
Hans L. Hillege,
Douwe Postmus
et al.
|
Full-length article
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
26 December 2011 |
|
The Global Rating Scale complements the AGREE II in advancing the quality of practice guidelines
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.10.008
Abstract: Objective: To explore the role of a four-item Global Rating Scale (GRS) that could be used in place of the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II). Study Design and Se...
|
Melissa C. Brouwers,
Michelle E. Kho,
George P. Browman,
Jako S. Burgers,
Francoise Cluzeau,
Gene Feder,
Béatrice Fervers,
Ian D. Graham,
Jeremy Grimshaw,
Steven E. Hanna,
Peter Littlejohns,
Julie Makarski,
Louise Zitzelsberger,
AGREE Next Steps Consortium
et al.
|
Full-length article
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
21 December 2011 |
|
The use of weekly text messaging over 6 months was a feasible method for monitoring the clinical course of low back pain in patients seeking chiropractic care
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.012
Abstract: Objective: This study critically evaluates a new method of collecting frequent data using mobile phones and text messages. Fluctuating conditions such as low back pain (LBP) need frequent mo...
|
Iben Axén,
Lennart Bodin,
Gunnar Bergström,
Laszlo Halasz,
Fredrik Lange,
Peter W. Lövgren,
Annika Rosenbaum,
Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde,
Irene Jensen
et al.
|
Full-length article
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
12 December 2011 |
|
Covariate adjustment increased power in randomized controlled trials: an example in traumatic brain injury
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.08.012
Abstract: Objective: We aimed to determine to what extent covariate adjustment could affect power in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a heterogeneous population with traumatic brain injury (TBI)...
|
Elizabeth L. Turner,
Pablo Perel,
Tim Clayton,
Phil Edwards,
Adrian V. Hernández,
Ian Roberts,
Haleema Shakur,
Ewout W. Steyerberg,
CRASH trial collaborators
et al.
|
Full-length article
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
12 December 2011 |
|
Reliability analysis for a proposed critical appraisal tool demonstrated value for diverse research designs
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.08.006
Abstract: Objective: To examine the reliability of scores obtained from a proposed critical appraisal tool (CAT). Study Design and Setting: Based on a random sample of 24 health-related research paper...
|
Michael Crowe,
Lorraine Sheppard,
Alistair Campbell
|
Full-length article
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
14 November 2011 |
|
Case study: A patient–clinician collaboration that identified and prioritized evidence gaps and stimulated research development
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.016
Abstract: Objective: To assess the effect of a research prioritization partnership that aimed to influence the research agenda relating to urinary incontinence (UI). Study Design and Setting: Research...
|
Brian S. Buckley,
Adrian M. Grant,
Cathryn M.A. Glazener
|
Full-length article
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
05 August 2011 |
|
Mathematical coupling does not account for the association between baseline severity and minimally important change values
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.010
Abstract: A number of studies have demonstrated a correlation between baseline severity and minimally important change (MIC) values. However, Browne et al. stated that these studies failed to account ...
|
Berend Terluin
|
Discussion
(In Press Corrected Proof)
|
02 August 2011 |