Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 53, Issue 2 , Pages 183-194, February 2000

Using medical services claims to assess injuries in the elderly:

sensitivity of diagnostic and procedure codes for injury ascertainment

  • Robyn Tamblyn

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada
    • Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: (514) 8411231 ext. 6902; fax: (514) 843-1493.
  • ,
  • Tracey Reid

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
  • ,
  • Nancy Mayo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada
    • Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
  • ,
  • Peter McLeod

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
  • ,
  • Michael Churchill-Smith

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada

Received 28 September 1998; received in revised form 11 June 1999; accepted 16 June 1999.

Abstract 

The sensitivity of using physician claims data for injury ascertainment was examined in a cohort of 1,181 elderly who were treated in the emergency department of one of 10 hospitals for injuries in 1993–1994. The clinical record of the type and date of injury was compared with diagnostic and procedure codes in the Quebec health insurance agency records of physician billing claims for the same patients. The proportion of patients correctly classified by claims data was determined for the exact date of injury and for a time window around the date of injury. The most common injuries were fractures (55.4%) and lacerations (19.3%), and 78.9% of injuries were fall related. Overall, the combination of treatment procedure codes and diagnostic codes provided the most sensitive measure of injury occurrence; a sensitivity of 67.3% for the exact date and 81.3% for an expanded data window (95.6% of injuries were within −1 day to +3 days of the injury date). Sensitivity varied by injury type form a low of 14% for abrasions to a high of 97.2% for hip fractures. The combination of diagnostic and procedure codes in physician claims is a sensitive indicator of some common injuries that would not be documented in hospitalization databases.

Keywords:  Validation, Physician claims, Outcome, Injury, Elderly

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0895-4356(99)00136-5

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 53, Issue 2 , Pages 183-194, February 2000