Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 53, Issue 2 , Pages 195-205, February 2000

Use of grade membership analysis to profile the practice styles of individual physicians in the management of acute low back pain

  • Andreas Maetzel

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Healthcare Research Division, Arthritis and Immune Disorder Research Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: (416) 946-4501 ext. 4730; fax: (416) 946-2291. E-mail address: maetzel©whri.on.ca (A. Maetzel)
  • ,
  • Sheilah Hogg Johnson

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Max Woodbury

      Affiliations

    • Center for Demographic Studies, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
  • ,
  • Claire Bombardier

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Healthcare Research Division, Arthritis and Immune Disorder Research Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Clinical Epidemiology and Health Care Research Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Received 29 September 1998; received in revised form 25 May 1999; accepted 29 May 1999.

Abstract 

The objective of this study was to investigate Grade of Membership analysis (GoM) as a means of profiling the practice styles of individual physicians. GoM uses maximum likelihood techniques to estimate occurrences of management items that define unique practice styles. It also provides statistical estimates (grade of membership coefficients) of how well each individual physician's practice fits the identified styles. Data sources were responses to a mailed survey asking 814 physicians to select from predetermined management options in three scenarios depicting patients with acute low back pain. Four distinct types of practice style were identified: watchful waiting; investigative; guideline based; and physiotherapy focused. Most physicians were characterized by high grades of membership in the two profiles that most closely matched existing guidelines for the management of acute low back pain. GoM successfully identified characteristic practice styles, and the GoM coefficients obtained provided descriptions of individual management approaches. GoM is data driven and less subject to judgment than opinion-based measures of performance. It has several potential applications in identifying physicians for whom some form of intervention would be beneficial.

Keywords:  Physician behavior, Practice style, Clinical competence, Physician's practice patterns, Physician profiling

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0895-4356(99)00120-1

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 53, Issue 2 , Pages 195-205, February 2000