Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 52, Issue 7 , Pages 609-613, July 1999

Hospital Mortality from Acute Myocardial Infarction Has Been Modestly Reduced after Introduction of Thrombolytics and Aspirin:

Results from a New Analytical Approach

  • Åsmund Reikvam

      Affiliations

    • Research Forum, Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Åsmund Reikvam, MD, Research Forum, Ullevål University Hospital, 0407 Oslo, Norway
  • ,
  • lvar Aursnes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacotherapeutics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • ,
  • for the European Secondary Prevention Study Group

      Affiliations

Accepted 8 March 1999.

Abstract 

The objective of this study was to investigate how the introduction of thrombolytics and aspirin has affected hospital mortality (case fatality) among patients with acute myocardial infarction. The study design was the application of the therapeutic effects found in the clinical trials in a nonselected myocardial infarction population characterized in detail. The study took place in health region 1 in Norway, population 850,000, and subjects were all patients hospitalized and discharged, alive or dead, with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the 10 hospitals in the region over a period of 2 months. The main outcome measures were deaths in hospital and estimation of expected hospital mortality without thrombolytics or aspirin, weighing and evaluating the effects of delay of different lengths from onset of symptoms to admission, different ages, and different electrocardiogram changes. We found that 32% of the patients received thrombolytics, and 72% received aspirin. Hospital mortality was 18.1% compared with 20.6% had neither of the treatments been administered, implying that the two regimens had reduced mortality by 12%, aspirin contributing about four fifths and thrombolytics one fifth. We conclude that hospital mortality in a nonselected myocardial infarction population has been reduced to moderate extent since the introduction of thrombolytics and aspirin. The effects observed in clinical trials are not translated into epidemiologically documented reduction in mortality, as the optimal conditions are found only in a proportion of the patient groups constituting a nonselected myocardial infarction population.

Keywords:  Myocardial infarction, thrombolytics, aspirin

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 
  •  European Secondary Prevention Study Group: C. Hagn (Austria), R. Kala (Finland), A. Leizorowicz (France), N. B. Karatzas (Greece), D. Vasiliauskas (Lithuania), Å. Reikvam (Norway), R. Seabra Gomes (Portugal), A. Agusti (Spain), L. Wilhelmsen (Sweden), J. Schilling (Switzerland), K. Woods, and D. Ketley (United Kingdom).

PII: S0895-4356(99)00042-6

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 52, Issue 7 , Pages 609-613, July 1999