Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 52, Issue 3 , Pages 237-241, March 1999

Validation of Logistic Regression Models in Small Samples:

Application to Calvarial Lesions Diagnosis

  • Daniel Bautista

      Affiliations

    • Department of Preventive Medicine, Hospital Malva-Rosa, Valencia, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Daniel Bautista, C/Josep Iturbi, 14-2, 46200 Paiporta, Valencia, Spain
  • ,
  • Estanislao Arana

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario Le Fe, Valencia, Spain
  • ,
  • Luis Martı́-Bonmatı́

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, Valencia, Spain
  • ,
  • Roberto Paredes

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Technical Informatic, Polytechnic University, Valencia, Spain

Accepted 3 November 1998.

Abstract 

We have used the leave-one-out (LOO) method and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to validate logistic models with a sample of 167 patients with calvarial lesions. Seven logistic regression models were developed from 12 clinical and radiological variables to predict the most common diagnoses separately. The LOO method was used to test the validity of the equations. The discriminant power of every model was assessed by means of the area under the ROC curve (Az). The model with the greatest discrimination ability for the whole data set was the osteoma equation (Az = 0.951). The discriminatory ability of the statistical models decreased significantly with the LOO procedure, having the malignancy model the highest value (Az = 0.931). The LOO method can obtain a high benefit from small samples in order to validate prediction rules. In studies with small samples, resampling techniques such as the LOO should be routinely used in predictive modeling. This method may improve the forecast of infrequent diseases, such as calvarial lesions.

Keywords:  Logistic models, computed tomography, head, ROC-analysis, leave-one-out method, skull, neoplasms

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0895-4356(98)00165-6

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 52, Issue 3 , Pages 237-241, March 1999