Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 52, Issue 3 , Pages 199-207, March 1999

The Use of Automated Data to Identify Complications and Comorbidities of Diabetes:

A Validation Study

  • Katherine M. Newton

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Seattle, WA USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Dr. K. Newton, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Center for Health Studies, Suite 1600, 1730 Minor Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101
  • ,
  • Edward H. Wagner

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Seattle, WA USA
    • Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
  • ,
  • Scott D. Ramsey

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
    • Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
  • ,
  • David McCulloch

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Seattle, WA USA
  • ,
  • Rhian Evans

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Seattle, WA USA
  • ,
  • Nirmala Sandhu

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Seattle, WA USA
  • ,
  • Connie Davis

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Seattle, WA USA

Accepted 30 October 1998.

Abstract 

We evaluated the accuracy of administrative data for identifying complications and comorbidities of diabetes using International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition, Clinical Modification and Current Procedural Terminology codes. The records of 471 randomly selected diabetic patients were reviewed for complications from January 1, 1993 to December 31, 1995; chart data served to validate automated data. The complications with the highest sensitivity determined by a diagnosis in the medical records identified within ±60 days of the database date were myocardial infarction (95.2%); amputation (94.4%); ischemic heart disease (90.3%); stroke (91.2%); osteomyelitis (79.2%); and retinal detachment, vitreous hemorrhage, and vitrectomy (73.5%). With the exception of amputation (82.9%), positive predictive value was low when based on a diagnosis identified within ±60 days of the database date but increased with relaxation of the time constraints to include confirmation of the condition at any time during 1993–1995: ulcers (88.5%); amputation (85.4%); and retinal detachment, vitreous hemorrhage and vitrectomy (79.8%). Automated data are useful for ascertaining potential cases of some diabetic complications but require confirmatory evidence when they are to be used for research purposes.

Keywords:  Diabetes, complications, validation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0895-4356(98)00161-9

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 52, Issue 3 , Pages 199-207, March 1999