Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 52, Issue 4 , Pages 281-291, April 1999

Recursive Cumulative Meta-analysis:

A Diagnostic for the Evolution of Total Randomized Evidence from Group and Individual Patient Data

  • John P.A Ioannidis

      Affiliations

    • Therapeutics Research Program, Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: John P. A. Ioannidis, M.D., 23A Kalavryton St., Ano Voula 16673, Greece
  • ,
  • Despina G Contopoulos-Ioannidis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC USA
  • ,
  • Joseph Lau

      Affiliations

    • Division of Clinical Care Research, New England Medical Center Hospitals, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA USA

Accepted 6 November 1998.

Abstract 

Meta-analyses of randomized evidence may include published, unpublished, and updated data in an ongoing estimation process that continuously accommodates more data. Synthesis may be performed either with group data or with meta-analysis of individual patient data (MIPD). Although MIPD with updated data is considered the gold standard of evidence, there is a need for a careful study of the impact different sources of data have on a meta-analysis and of the change in the treatment effect estimates over sequential information steps. Unpublished data and late-appearing data may be different from early-appearing data. Updated information after the end of the main study follow-up may be affected by cross-overs, missing information, and unblinding. The estimated treatment effect may thus depend on the completeness and updating of the available evidence. To address these issues, we present recursive cumulative meta-analysis (RCM) as an extension of cumulative meta-analysis. Recursive cumulative meta-analysis is based on the principle of recalculating the results of a cumulative meta-analysis with each new or updated piece of information and focuses on the evolution of the treatment effect as a more complete and updated picture of the evidence becomes available. An examination of the perturbations of the cumulative treatment effect over sequential information steps may signal the presence of bias or heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Recursive cumulative meta-analysis may suggest whether there is a true underlying treatment effect to which the meta-analysis is converging and how treatment effects are sequentially altered by new or modified evidence. The method is illustrated with an example from the conduct of an MIPD on acyclovir in human immunodeficiency virus infection. The relative strengths and limitations of both meta-analysis of group data and MIPD are discussed through the RCM perspective.

Keywords:  Meta-analysis, randomized trials, bias, study design, publication bias

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0895-4356(98)00159-0

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 52, Issue 4 , Pages 281-291, April 1999