Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 52, Issue 3 , Pages 181-186, March 1999

Functional Status of Elderly Home Care Users:

Do Subjects, Informal and Professional Caregivers Agree?

  • B Santos-Eggimann

      Affiliations

    • Institut Universitaire de Médecine Sociale et Préventive, Lausanne, Switzerland
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: B. Santos-Eggimann, Institut Universitaire de Médecine Sociale et Préventive, 17 rue du Bugnon, CH-1005 Lausanne, Switzerland
  • ,
  • F Zobel

      Affiliations

    • Institut Universitaire de Médecine Sociale et Préventive, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • ,
  • A.Clerc Bérod

      Affiliations

    • Institut Universitaire de Médecine Sociale et Préventive, Lausanne, Switzerland

Accepted 6 November 1998.

Abstract 

Professional or informal proxy respondents are frequently used in surveys when physical or mental health may compromise the ability to participate or the quality of responses. Functional status (Katz activities of daily living [ADL], Lawton instrumental activities of daily living [IADL]) was assessed in a sample of 420 chronically dependent elderly receiving home care. Separate in-person interviews were conducted with subjects, main informal caregivers and professionals coordinating home care. We found substantial agreement (Kappa) particularly between subjects and informal caregivers in all ADL except continence and in all IADL except housekeeping. High levels of agreement were also found for cognitively impaired subjects (Mini-Mental State Examination <24). Disagreement was characterized by more frequent reports of dependence from informal and professional caregivers. Our data suggest that proxy responses by informal caregivers conform with answers provided by subjects but produce slightly higher estimates of dependence and that cognitively impaired elderly living in the community will provide accurate information on their functional status in most cases.

Keywords:  Survey methodology, functional status, inter-rater agreement, elderly, caregivers, home care

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0895-4356(98)00155-3

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 52, Issue 3 , Pages 181-186, March 1999