Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 51, Issue 10 , Pages 809-816, October 1998

Using Binary Logistic Regression Models for Ordinal Data with Non-proportional Odds

  • Ralf Bender

      Affiliations

    • Department of Metabolic Diseases and Nutrition, Heinrich-Heine-University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Ralf Bender, Ph.D., Department of Metabolic Diseases and Nutrition, Heinrich-Heine-University of Düsseldorf, P.O. Box 101007, D-40001, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • ,
  • Ulrich Grouven

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Research Group Informatics and Biometry, Hannover Medical School, Hospital Oststadt, Hannover, Germany

Abstract 

The proportional odds model (POM) is the most popular logistic regression model for analyzing ordinal response variables. However, violation of the main model assumption can lead to invalid results. This is demonstrated by application of this method to data of a study investigating the effect of smoking on diabetic retinopathy. Since the proportional odds assumption is not fulfilled, separate binary logistic regression models are used for dichotomized response variables based upon cumulative probabilities. This approach is compared with polytomous logistic regression and the partial proportional odds model. The separate binary logistic regression approach is slightly less efficient than a joint model for the ordinal response. However, model building, investigating goodness-of-fit, and interpretation of the results is much easier for binary responses. The careful application of separate binary logistic regressions represents a simple and adequate tool to analyze ordinal data with non-proportional odds.

Keywords:  Logistic regression, ordinal data, proportional odds model, non-proportional odds, diabetic retinopathy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Accepted for publication on 5 May 1998.

PII: S0895-4356(98)00066-3

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 51, Issue 10 , Pages 809-816, October 1998