Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 50, Issue 12 , Pages 1311-1318, December 1997

The Powerful Placebo Effect: Fact or Fiction?

  • Gunver S Kienle

      Affiliations

    • Institut für Angewandte Erkenntnistheorie und Medizinische Methodologie, D-79112 Freiburg, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationDr. med. Gunver S. Kienle, Institut für angewandte Erkenntnistheorie und medizinische Methodologie, Muselgasse 10, D-79112 Freiburg, Germany
  • ,
  • Helmut Kiene

      Affiliations

    • Institut für Angewandte Erkenntnistheorie und Medizinische Methodologie, D-79112 Freiburg, Germany

Accepted 20 August 1997.

Abstract 

In 1955, Henry K. Beecher published the classic work entitled “The Powerful Placebo.” Since that time, 40 years ago, the placebo effect has been considered a scientific fact. Beecher was the first scientist to quantify the placebo effect. He claimed that in 15 trials with different diseases, 35% of 1082 patients were satisfactorily relieved by a placebo alone. This publication is still the most frequently cited placebo reference.

Recently Beecher's article was reanalyzed with surprising results: In contrast to his claim, no evidence was found of any placebo effect in any of the studies cited by him. There were many other factors that could account for the reported improvements in patients in these trials, but most likely there was no placebo effect whatsoever.

False impressions of placebo effects can be produced in various ways. Spontaneous improvement, fluctuation of symptoms, regression to the mean, additional treatment, conditional switching of placebo treatment, scaling bias, irrelevant response variables, answers of politeness, experimental subordination, conditioned answers, neurotic or psychotic misjudgment, psychosomatic phenomena, misquotation, etc.

These factors are still prevalent in modern placebo literature. The placebo topic seems to invite sloppy methodological thinking. Therefore awareness of Beecher's mistakes and misinterpretations is essential for an appropriate interpretation of current placebo literature.

Keywords:  Placebo, placebo effect

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0895-4356(97)00203-5

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 50, Issue 12 , Pages 1311-1318, December 1997