Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 49, Issue 12 , Pages 1401-1405, December 1996

The diagnostic value of the measurement of the ankle-brachial systolic pressure index in primary health care

  • Henri E.J.H. Stoffers

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Dr. Henri E.J. H. Stoffers, Department of General Practice, University of Limburg, P.O. Box 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
    • Department of General Practice, University of Limburg, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Arnold D.M. Kester

      Affiliations

    • Department of Methodology and Statistics, University of Limburg, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Victor Kaiser

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Practice, University of Limburg, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Paula E.L.M. Rinkens

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Practice, University of Limburg, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Peter J.E.H.M. Kitslaar

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Limburg, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • J.André Knottnerus

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Practice, University of Limburg, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands

Accepted 25 June 1996.

Abstract 

We investigated the value of the ankle-brachial systolic pressure index (ABPI) as a test for the diagnosis of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) in general practice. ABPI measurements on 231 legs of 117 subjects performed in three general practice centers (GPC) were compared with the diagnostic conclusions of a Vascular Laboratory. The optimum cutoff value for the ABPI, its accuracy and diagnostic value were estimated. In a subpopulation of 51 subjects for whom repeated measurements were available, we checked whether taking the mean of three consecutive ABPIs for test outcome would enhance diagnostic performance.

Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis showed that overall performance of the GPC ABPI was good (area under the curve ≈ 0.9). Performing repeated ABPI measurements was superior to performing a single measurement. The optimum cutoff value for the ABPI was 0.97, associated with a diagnostic odds ratio (OR) of 17 and an accuracy of 81%. In a somewhat more selected subpopulation, the optimum cutoff value was 0.92 (OR 70, accuracy 90%).

On the basis of our results, we suggest the following rule of thumb: if the ABPI < 0.8 or if the mean of three ABPIs < 0.9, it is highly probable that PAOD is present (PV+ ≥ 95%); if the ABPI > 1.1 or if the mean of three ABPIs > 1.0, PAOD can be ruled out (PV− ≥ 99%).

In conclusion, in primary health care, the ABPI measurement can be a useful supplementary test in ambiguous diagnostic situations with regard to PAOD.

Keywords:  Arterial occlusive disease, diagnosis, ultrasound, general practice, clinical epidemiology

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The Limburg PAOD Study was financed by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (900-715.154) and the Praeventiefonds (28-1323). Doppler devices were donated by ASTA Medica BV.

PII: S0895-4356(96)00275-2

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 49, Issue 12 , Pages 1401-1405, December 1996