Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 49, Issue 12 , Pages 1419-1422 , December 1996

The contribution of personal rating to the clinimetric functioning of a generic quality of life instrument

  • Benjamin Mozes

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: B. Mozes, MD, Gertner Institute for Health Services Research, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer 52621, Israel.
  • ,
  • Esther Shabtai

,Accepted 5 June 1996.

References 

  1. Deyo RA. The quality of life, research, and care. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:695–696
  2. In: Quality of life. 2nd ed.. Lancet. 338:1991;p. 350–351
  3. Gill TA, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of life measurements. JAMA. 1994;272:619–626
  4. Wright JG, Feinstein AR. A comparative contrast of clinimetric and psychometric methods for constructing indexes and rating scales. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:1201–1218
  5. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The sickness impact profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981;19:787–805
  6. Hunt SM, McEwen J. The development of a subjective health indicator. Sociology of Health and Illness. 1980;2:231–246
  7. Dazord A, Gerin P, Boissel JP. Subjective quality of life assessment in therapeutic trials: Presentation of a new instrument in France (SQLP: subjective quality of life profile) and first results. In:  Orley J,  Kuyken W editor. Quality of Life Assessment: International perspectives. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1994;p. 185–195
  8. Ferrans CE, Powers MJ. Quality of life of hemodialysis patients. ANNA J. 1993;20:575–581
  9. Kirshner B, Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chron Dis. 1985;38:27–36
  10. Spitzer WO, Dobson AJ, Hall J, et al.  Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients. J Chron Dis. 1981;34:585–597
  11. Einot I, Gabriel KR. A study of the powers of several methods of multiple comparisons. JASA. 1975;70:351
  12. Deyo RA, Centor RM. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chron Dis. 1986;39:897–906
  13. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chron Dis. 1987;40:171–178
  14. Liang MH, Larson MG, Cullen KE, Schwartz JA. Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of the health status instruments for arthritis research. Arth Rheum. 1985;28:542–547
  15. Fox E, Peace K, Neale TJ, et al.  “Quality of life” for patients with end stage renal failure. Renal Failure. 1991;13:31–35
  16. Barret BJ, Vavasour HM, Major A, Parfrey PS. Clinical and psychological correlates of somatic symptoms in patients with dialysis. Nephron. 1990;55:10–15
  17. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297
  18. McClellan WM, Anson C, Birkeli K, Tuttle E. Functional status and quality of life: Predictors of early mortality among patients entering treatment for end stage renal disease. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:83–89

PII: S0895-4356(96)00273-9

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 49, Issue 12 , Pages 1419-1422 , December 1996