Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 49, Issue 12 , Pages 1423-1428, December 1996

Optimal cut-points when screening for more than one disease state: An example from the canadian study of health and aging

  • Betsy Kristjansson

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Betsy Kristjansson, Canadian Study of Health and Aging, Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8M5.
    • Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada K1H 8M5
  • ,
  • Gerry Hill

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada K1H 8M5
  • ,
  • Ian McDowell

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada K1H 8M5
  • ,
  • Joan Lindsay

      Affiliations

    • Bureau of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Laboratory Centre For Disease Control, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0L2

Accepted 3 July 1996.

Abstract 

A method is described for choosing optimal cut-points in a screening test with a continuous score in order to divide people into any number of disease categories. The cut-points are chosen to minimize the overall expected loss, given a matrix of losses incurred by misclassifications. It is shown that the optimal cut-points depend on the column differences of the loss matrix. The effect of changing the loss matrix is examined. For the error counting matrix, where misclassifications are given equal weight, it is shown that the relationship between the minimal loss cut-point and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for two disease categories extends to the general case. The results of a study in which elderly people were screened for cognitive impairment and dementia are used to illustrate the method.

Keywords:  Decision making, dementia, diagnostic errors, mass screening

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by the Canadian Seniors' Independence Research Program, Administered by the National Health Research and Development Program (Project No. 6606-3954-MC(S)).

PII: S0895-4356(96)00272-7

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 49, Issue 12 , Pages 1423-1428, December 1996