« Previous
Next »
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 63, Issue 8
, Pages 834-840
, August 2010
CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
References
- . Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2001;323:42–46
- . Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals. Lancet. 2005;365:1159–1162
- . What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?. BMJ. 2008;336:1472–1474
- Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e3081
- Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA. 1996;276:637–639
- . The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001;357:1191–1194
- . The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:657–662
- . The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA. 2001;285:1987–1991
- Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust. 2006;185:263–267
- . The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: a comparative study of articles indexed by PubMed. BMJ. 2010;340:c723
- . CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2004;328:702–708
- . Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA. 2006;295:1152–1160
- CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c869
- . Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995;273:408–412
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?. Lancet. 1998;352:609–613
- . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535
- Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ. 2003;326:41–44
- . Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335:806–808
- . A proposal for structured reporting of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1994;272:1926–1931
- . Reporting randomized controlled trials. An experiment and a call for responses from readers. JAMA. 1995;273:1054–1055
- CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts. Lancet. 2008;371:281–283
- . Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA. 2004;291:2457–2465
- . Commentary: Measuring the success of blinding in RCTs: don't, must, can't or needn't?. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:664–665
- . Blinding in randomised trials: hiding who got what. Lancet. 2002;359:696–700
- Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;294:2203–2209
- . What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 1999;319:670–674
- . Reporting number needed to treat and absolute risk reduction in randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2002;287:2813–2814
- Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:781–788
- Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Lancet. 2004;364:911–912
- . Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ. 2003;326:1167–1170
- CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e20
- . Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:295–309
- . Reporting randomized, controlled trials of herbal interventions: an elaborated CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:364–367
- Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ. 2008;337:a2390
The CONSORT statement is used worldwide to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials. Kenneth Schulz and colleagues describe the latest version, CONSORT 2010, which updates the reporting guideline based on new methodological evidence and accumulating experience.
In order to encourage dissemination of the CONSORT 2010 Statement, this article is freely accessible on bmj.com and will also be published in the Lancet, Obstetrics and Gynecology, PloS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, Open Medicine, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, BMC Medicine, and Trials. The authors jointly hold the copyright for this article. For details on further use, see the CONSORt website (www.consort-statement.org).
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
PII: S0895-4356(10)00079-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.005
© 2010 Schulz et al. Published by Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 63, Issue 8
, Pages 834-840
, August 2010
