« Previous
Next »
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 63, Issue 5
, Pages 476-478
, May 2010
AHRQ Series Commentary 2: Informative, timely, and valuable: an outsider view of the Comparative Effectiveness Review articles
References
- Agency for Healthcare Research (AHRQ). Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews. Available from: http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/search-for-guides-reviews-and-reports/?pageaction=displayproduct&productid=318.
- . AHRQ Series Paper 1: Comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:481–483(In this issue)
- . AHRQ Series Editorial: Public involvement improves methods development in comparative effectiveness reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:471–473(In this issue)
- In: Higgins JPT, Green S editor. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. version 5.0.2. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2009;Available from www.cochrane-handbook.orgAccessed September 2009
- . AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:502–512(In this issue)
- . AHRQ Series Paper 5: Grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions-Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Effective Health Care Program. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:513–523(In this issue)
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–926
Conflict of interest: The author is an employee of The Cochrane Collaboration.
PII: S0895-4356(10)00025-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.01.001
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 63, Issue 5
, Pages 476-478
, May 2010
