Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 63, Issue 8 , Pages 932-937, August 2010

Medical record validation of maternally reported history of preeclampsia

  • Marianne Coolman

      Affiliations

    • The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, SKZ 4130, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31-10-704-6886; fax: +31-10-704-6815.
  • ,
  • Christianne J.M. de Groot

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Centre Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Vincent W. Jaddoe

      Affiliations

    • The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Albert Hofman

      Affiliations

    • The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Hein Raat

      Affiliations

    • Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Eric A.P. Steegers

      Affiliations

    • The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Accepted 9 October 2009. published online 02 March 2010.

Abstract 

Objective

In this study, we assessed the validity of maternally self-reported history of preeclampsia.

Study Design and Setting

This study was embedded in the Generation R Study, a population-based prospective cohort study. Data were obtained from prenatal questionnaires and one questionnaire obtained 2 months postpartum from the mother. All women who delivered in hospital and returned a 2-month postpartum questionnaire (n = 4,330) were selected.

Results

Of the 4,330 women, 76 out of 152 (50%) women who self-reported preeclampsia appeared not to have had the disease according to the definition (International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy). From the women who self-reported not to have experienced preeclampsia, 11 out of 4,178 (0.3%) had suffered from preeclampsia. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 and 0.98, respectively. Higher maternal education level and parity were associated with a better self-reported diagnosis of preeclampsia.

Conclusion

The validity of maternal-recall self-reported preeclampsia is moderate. The reduced self-reported preeclampsia might suggest a lack of accuracy in patient–doctor communication with regard to the diagnostic criteria of the disease. Therefore, doctors have to pay attention to make sure that women understand the nature of preeclampsia.

Keywords: Validation, Self-reported, Preeclampsia, Pregnancy, Hypertensive disorder, Cardiovascular disease

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Marianne Coolman is supported by Revolving Fund, and Christianne J.M. de Groot is supported as Clinical Fellow by The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).

PII: S0895-4356(09)00368-0

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.10.010

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 63, Issue 8 , Pages 932-937, August 2010