Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 63, Issue 2 , Pages 115-116 , February 2010

Credibility and methodology of effectiveness research keep us busy

References 

  1. Falagas ME, Grigori T, Ioannidou E. A systematic review of trends in the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in various research fields. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:227–231
  2. Fletcher RH. Evaluation of interventions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:1183–1190
  3. Knottnerus JA, Tugwell P. Focus on nonexperimental approaches. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:1225
  4. Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ. 2003;326:1167–1170
  5. Bero L. “Experimental” institutional models for corporate funding of academic research: unknown effects on the research enterprise. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:629–633
  6. Bero L, Oostvogel F, Bacchetti P, Lee K. Factors associated with findings of published trials of drug-drug comparisons: why some statins appear more efficacious than others. PLoS Med. 2007;4(6):e184
  7. Garattini S, Chalmers I. Patients and the public deserve big changes in evaluation of drugs. BMJ. 2009;338:b1025
  8. Austin PC. The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:537–545

PII: S0895-4356(09)00355-2

doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.003

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 63, Issue 2 , Pages 115-116 , February 2010

Article Tools