Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 62, Issue 12 , Page 1225 , December 2009

Focus on nonexperimental approaches

References 

  1. Black N. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. BMJ. 1996;312:1215–1218
  2. Vandenbroucke JP. Observational research and evidence-based medicine: what should we teach young physicians?. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:467–472
  3. Leigh JP, Schembri M. Instrumental variables technique: cigarette price provided better estimate of effects of smoking on SF-12. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:284–293
  4. Klungel OH, Martens EP, Psaty BM, Grobbee DE, Sullivan SD, Stricker BH, et al. Methods to assess intended effects of drug treatment in observational studies are reviewed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:1223–1231
  5. Knottnerus JA, Muris JW. Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1118–1128
  6. Irwig L, Macaskill P, Glasziou P, Fahey M. Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:119–130
  7. Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AWS, Scholten RJPM, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:982–990
  8. Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM. We should not pool diagnostic likelihood ratios in systematic reviews. Stat Med. 2008;27:687–697

PII: S0895-4356(09)00292-3

doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.09.003

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 62, Issue 12 , Page 1225 , December 2009