Cross-sectional reporting of previous Cesarean birth was validated using longitudinal linked data
Accepted 3 August 2009. published online 18 November 2009. Corrected Proof
Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of using linked health records to assess data quality in population health data.
Study Design and Setting
Reproductive histories of 155,897 women were constructed by longitudinal linkage of the New South Wales (Australia) birth records in 1998–2005, and 127,952 birth and hospital discharge records in 2000–2005 were cross-sectionally linked. History of Cesarean section (CS) derived from the longitudinal linkage (“gold standard”) was used to validate the CS history fields (i.e., “Was the last birth by Cesarean section?” and “Total number of previous Cesarean sections?”) in birth records and to validate “vaginal birth after previous Cesarean (VBAC)” and “maternal care for uterine scar” in hospital records.
Results
The reporting of CS at last birth was reliable with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value all >95% as was the number of previous CS (weighted kappa=0.97). For the hospital data, sensitivity and PPV were 46% and 99% for VBAC, 92% and 99% for maternal care of uterine scar, and 85% and 99%, respectively, for any prior CS.
Conclusion
Assessing data quality by record linkage is feasible and can be done more quickly and cheaply than by any traditional validation study.
aClinical and Population Perinatal Health Research, The Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
bSurveillance Methods, Centre for Epidemiology and Research, NSW Department of Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
cSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Corresponding author. Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales 2065, Australia. Tel.: +61-2-99267328; fax: +61-2-99061859.
ABSTRACT
=