Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 63, Issue 4 , Pages 412-421, April 2010

The predictors of self-rated health and the relationship between self-rated health and health service needs are similar across socioeconomic groups in Canada

  • Peter M. Smith

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Institute for Work & Health, 481 University Avenue, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2E9, Canada. Tel.: +1-416-927-2027 ext. 2226.
  • ,
  • Richard H. Glazier

      Affiliations

    • Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Center for Research on Inner City Health, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Lyn M. Sibley

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Accepted 18 August 2009. published online 18 November 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

To examine if there are systematic differences in the predictors of self-rated health (SRH) and to examine the relationship between SRH and health care utilization across socioeconomic groups.

Study Design and Setting

We used cross-sectional data from the Canadian Community Health Survey linked to the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (N=17,109). We examined relative differences in the factors associated with different levels of SRH across socioeconomic groups (as assessed by education and household income) using probit models separately for men and women. We then examined differences in expected health care costs, as assessed by adjusted clinical group weights using administrative health care records, between socioeconomic groups within the same level of SRH.

Results

We found limited differences across the predictive ability of a broad range of physical, mental, health service/care utilization, and health behavior variables on SRH across socioeconomic groups. In addition, no differences were found in the expected health care utilization costs across socioeconomic groups within the same level of SRH.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that SRH assesses a broad variety of factors, including physical health status, mental health status, health service/care utilization, and health behaviors, relatively equally across socioeconomic groups, measured as either education or income.

Keywords: Self-rated health, Socioeconomic status, Adjusted clinical groups (ACGs), Canada

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0895-4356(09)00268-6

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.015

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 63, Issue 4 , Pages 412-421, April 2010